Current practice in mammographic imaging of the augmented breast in Australia

作者: Jacquelyn R O'Keefe , Jenny Maree Wilkinson , Kelly Maree Spuur

DOI: 10.1002/JMRS.374

关键词: MammographyMedicineMedical physicsBreast augmentationCurrent practiceBreast cancerDescriptive statisticsMedical imagingBreast imagingRadiation therapy

摘要: AIM This study seeks to document the imaging series used in contemporary Australian practice for augmented breast, with a secondary focus on differences and opinion between BreastScreen Australia diagnostic services. METHODS A SurveyMonkey link was distributed through Society of Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) assessable during December 2017 January 2018. The questionnaire investigated: years experience, facility type location, image acquisition systems, appointment times, patients imaged per week, technique used, use limited compression views, rationale variation ultrasound. Descriptive statistics were produced all variables chi-squared tests comparisons categorical variables. RESULTS most frequently eight-image Eklund ID 64% 59% (submuscular) 68% 58% (subglandular) BSA services, respectively. Eighteen different combinations projections reported eight common both subglandular submuscular imaging. majority participants attributed preferences dose reduction radiologist preference. CONCLUSION research has demonstrated varied approaches routine women breast implants identified need establishment dedicated evidence-based protocols ensure that regardless which setting woman attends they receive standardised minimal maximum coverage. is reassurance not applicable current practice.

参考文章(20)
Hannah Headon, Adbul Kasem, Kefah Mokbel, Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Update for Clinical Practice Archives of Plastic Surgery. ,vol. 42, pp. 532- 543 ,(2015) , 10.5999/APS.2015.42.5.532
Takayoshi Uematsu, Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in augmented women. Breast Cancer. ,vol. 15, pp. 159- 164 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S12282-008-0036-1
Eric Lavigne, Jacques Brisson, Can breast implants hinder breast cancer survival Women's Health. ,vol. 9, pp. 419- 420 ,(2013) , 10.2217/WHE.13.42
S.A. McIntosh, K. Horgan, Augmentation mammoplasty: effect on diagnosis of breast cancer Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. ,vol. 61, pp. 124- 129 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BJPS.2007.06.035
T M Svahn, D P Chakraborty, D Ikeda, S Zackrisson, Y Do, S Mattsson, I Andersson, Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 85, ,(2012) , 10.1259/BJR/53282892
Eline C. Noels, Oren Lapid, Jan H.N. Lindeman, Esther Bastiaannet, Breast Implants and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Aesthetic Surgery Journal. ,vol. 35, pp. 55- 62 ,(2015) , 10.1093/ASJ/SJU006
Xue Qin Yu, Roberta De Angelis, Qingwei Luo, Clare Kahn, Nehmat Houssami, Dianne L O’Connell, A population-based study of breast cancer prevalence in Australia: predicting the future health care needs of women living with breast cancer BMC Cancer. ,vol. 14, pp. 936- 936 ,(2014) , 10.1186/1471-2407-14-936
Neal Handel, Melvin J. Silverstein, Breast Cancer Detection in Women with Implants Seminars in Breast Disease. ,vol. 7, pp. 172- 181 ,(2004) , 10.1053/J.SEMBD.2006.03.005
J M Destouet, B S Monsees, R F Oser, J R Nemecek, V L Young, T K Pilgram, Screening mammography in 350 women with breast implants: prevalence and findings of implant complications. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 159, pp. 973- 978 ,(1992) , 10.2214/AJR.159.5.1414810
G.L. Bantick, I. Taggart, Mammography and breast implants. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. ,vol. 48, pp. 49- 52 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90032-2