Risks and benefits to cats of free roaming versus containment

作者: Naima Kasbaoui

DOI:

关键词: Public economicsGeographyWildlifeFelisRoamingPerceptionOperations managementSelection biasPopulationrestrictWelfare

摘要: Free roaming domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) are widespread around the world. Whether they owned or not, their presence and management raises strong opinions between supporters of “cat independence”, advocates safety” defenders wildlife, leading to suggestions that should have freedom roam outdoors restricted. The aim this thesis was get a precise understanding concepts free containment in cats, meaning for relationship society living in, both from cats’ ‘point view’ perceptions owners, impact on cat welfare. Using variety approaches including survey, GPS tracking, behavioural tests an owner-based questionnaire, we showed although many people’s about depended residential location ownership status, risk road traffic accidents rated highly as concern by people regardless status. This perception matched behaviour themselves, who, home were observed frequently engage risky like frequent crossing. represents high wellbeing and, combined with other risks posed go outside, makes clear case need restrict cat’s behaviour, order protect its Given problems indoor only lifestyle, which may perhaps be greater than is widely recognised, there examining welfare effective system, restricts boundaries owner’s property (both minimising disruption community). Options limited, little currently known impact. Therefore I examined electronic system thought but also causes regarding effect first research such sought establish if concerns justified outweighed potential benefits. First, gathered initial information series, then carried out more comprehensive study larger sample cats. series failed evidence consistent negative In follow-on study, population studied, found no long term Indeed, contained interacted people, curious novel objects sensitive sudden noise control whether these effects due selection bias volunteers remains unknown. viii Although questions been addressed, unanswered remain, directions future identified discussed.

参考文章(284)
D. M. Weary, E. A. Pajor, B. N. Milligan, D. Fraser, A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare. ,vol. 6, pp. 187- 205 ,(1997)
G. Iossa, C. D. Soulsbury, Philip John Baker, S. Harris, Domestic cat (Felis catus) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris) John Hopkins University Press. ,(2010)
Onur Özgün Derincegöz, Nuh Kılıç, Surgical treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in a cat caused by dog bite Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. ,vol. 40, pp. 01- 04 ,(2012)
Joanna Babińska-Werka, Dagny Krauze-Gryz, Michał Wasilewski, Karolina Jasińska, Effectiveness of an acoustic wildlife warning device using natural calls to reduce the risk of train collisions with animals Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment. ,vol. 38, pp. 6- 14 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.TRD.2015.04.021
Inigo Zuberogoitia, Javier del Real, Juan José Torres, Luis Rodriguez, Maria Alonso, Vicente de Alba, Carmen Azahara, Jabi Zabala, None, Testing pole barriers as feasible mitigation measure to avoid bird vehicle collisions (BVC) Ecological Engineering. ,vol. 83, pp. 144- 151 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOLENG.2015.06.026
Evangeline A. Wheeler, Margaret E. Faulkner, The “Pet Effect” Society & Animals. ,vol. 23, pp. 425- 438 ,(2015) , 10.1163/15685306-12341374
Christopher A. Lepczyk, Cheryl A. Lohr, David C. Duffy, A review of cat behavior in relation to disease risk and management options Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 173, pp. 29- 39 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2015.07.002
Lucia Moretti, Marleen Hentrup, Kurt Kotrschal, Friederike Range, The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 107, pp. 159- 173 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2015.06.008
Elizabeth Rowe, William Browne, Rachel Casey, Tim Gruffydd-Jones, Jane Murray, Risk factors identified for owner-reported feline obesity at around one year of age: Dry diet and indoor lifestyle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. ,vol. 121, pp. 273- 281 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.PREVETMED.2015.07.011