Cue interaction in human contingency judgment

作者: Gretchen B. Chapman , Steven J. Robbins

DOI: 10.3758/BF03198486

关键词: CognitionContingencyCausal learningStimulus (physiology)Developmental psychologyConditioned inhibitionCognitive psychologyPsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

摘要: Most studies of human contingency judgment have been based on the assumption that frequency information about one predictor is assessed in isolation other predictors. Recent evidence, however, suggests judged predictive strength cue influenced by strengths copresent cues. Two experiments demonstrate stimuli with same outcome contingencies may nonetheless different as result interaction. The first experiment, which a within-subject design was used, provides demonstration blocking. A stimulus presented compound strong rated less than another in-compound non-predictive cue. In second interactions conditioned inhibition were examined. gained negative presentations positive when not presented. This compared an otherwise analogous predictor. These results support use animal-conditioning models accounts learning.

参考文章(29)
L. J. Kamin, Attention-like processes in classical conditioning Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior : Aversive stimulation. pp. 9- 31 ,(1967)
Robert A Rescorla, None, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement Classical conditioning II : Current research and theory. pp. 64- 99 ,(1972)
David R. Shanks, Anthony Dickinson, Associative Accounts of Causality Judgment Psychology of Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 21, pp. 229- 261 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60030-4
Frederic Vallee-Tourangeau, Mitchell W. Berbrier, A. G. Baker, Judgements of a 2 × 2 contingency table: Sequential processing and the learning curve. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B-comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,(1989)
David R. Shanks, Selectional processes in causality judgment. Memory & Cognition. ,vol. 17, pp. 27- 34 ,(1989) , 10.3758/BF03199554
Robert A. Rescorla, Pavlovian conditioned inhibition Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 72, pp. 77- 94 ,(1969) , 10.1037/H0027760
Harriet Shaklee, Michael Mims, Sources of error in judging event covariations: Effects of memory demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 8, pp. 208- 224 ,(1982) , 10.1037/0278-7393.8.3.208
N. J. Mackintosh, A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement Psychological Review. ,vol. 82, pp. 276- 298 ,(1975) , 10.1037/H0076778
Harriet Shaklee, Human covariation judgment: Accuracy and strategy Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 14, pp. 433- 448 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0023-9690(83)90026-7