作者: Gretchen B. Chapman , Steven J. Robbins
DOI: 10.3758/BF03198486
关键词: Cognition 、 Contingency 、 Causal learning 、 Stimulus (physiology) 、 Developmental psychology 、 Conditioned inhibition 、 Cognitive psychology 、 Psychology 、 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 、 Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) 、 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
摘要: Most studies of human contingency judgment have been based on the assumption that frequency information about one predictor is assessed in isolation other predictors. Recent evidence, however, suggests judged predictive strength cue influenced by strengths copresent cues. Two experiments demonstrate stimuli with same outcome contingencies may nonetheless different as result interaction. The first experiment, which a within-subject design was used, provides demonstration blocking. A stimulus presented compound strong rated less than another in-compound non-predictive cue. In second interactions conditioned inhibition were examined. gained negative presentations positive when not presented. This compared an otherwise analogous predictor. These results support use animal-conditioning models accounts learning.