Critical review of ‘pentafecta’ outcomes after robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high‐volume centres

作者: Vipul R. Patel , Haidar M. Abdul-Muhsin , Oscar Schatloff , Rafael F. Coelho , Rair Valero

DOI: 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2011.10521.X

关键词: SurgeryProstatectomyMEDLINEMedicineBiochemical recurrenceOutcome measuresProstate cancerGeneral surgeryTreatment outcomeOutcome analysisRobot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

摘要: • Historically, the ideal outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) has been measured by achievement so-called 'trifecta', or concurrent attainment continence and potency with no evidence biochemical recurrence. However, in PSA era, younger healthier men are more frequently diagnosed prostate cancer. Such patients have higher expectations from advanced minimally invasive surgical technologies. Mere trifecta is longer an measure to meet demands such patients. Keeping limitations mind, we earlier proposed a new method outcomes analysis, called 'pentafecta', which adds early complications positive margins (PSMs) trifecta. We performed Medline search for articles reporting complications, PSM rates, continence, recurrence after robot-assisted RP. Related were selected individual reviewed.

参考文章(87)
Ofer N Gofrit, Sergey A Shikanov, Aria Razmaria, Arieh L Shalhav, Gregory P Zagaja, Kevin C Zorn, Mark H Katz, Alan E Thong, Mark A Wille, Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Canadian Journal of Urology. ,vol. 16, pp. 4742- 4749 ,(2009)
Ahmed Magheli, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Li-Ming Su, Thomas J. Guzzo, George Netto, Elizabeth B. Humphreys, Misop Han, Alan W. Partin, Christian P. Pavlovich, Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching BJU International. ,vol. 107, pp. 1956- 1962 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09795.X
Ashutosh Tewari, Sandhya Rao, Juan I. Martinez-Salamanca, Robert Leung, Rajan Ramanathan, Anil Mandhani, E. Darracott Vaughan, Mani Menon, Wolfgang Horninger, Jiangling Tu, Georg Bartsch, Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy BJUI. ,vol. 101, pp. 1013- 1018 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2008.07456.X
Giacomo Novara, Vincenzo Ficarra, Carolina D’Elia, Silvia Secco, Stefano Cavalleri, Walter Artibani, Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJUI. ,vol. 107, pp. 100- 104 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2010.09505.X
Michael S. Lasser, Joseph Renzulli, George A. Turini, George Haleblian, Harry C. Sax, Gyan Pareek, An unbiased prospective report of perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. ,vol. 75, pp. 1083- 1089 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2009.09.082
Vipul R. Patel, Rahul Thaly, Ketul Shah, Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJUI. ,vol. 99, pp. 1109- 1112 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2007.06762.X
Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, ANATOMÍA QUIRÚRGICA DE LA PROSTATECTOMÍA RADICAL: FASCIAS Y ESFÍNTERES URINARIOS. Archivos españoles de urología. ,vol. 63, pp. 255- 266 ,(2010) , 10.4321/S0004-06142010000400002
Henk G. van der Poel, Willem de Blok, Neil Joshi, Eric van Muilekom, Preservation of Lateral Prostatic Fascia is Associated with Urine Continence after Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy European Urology. ,vol. 55, pp. 892- 901 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2009.01.021
David P. Wood, Ryan Schulte, Rodney L. Dunn, Brent K. Hollenbeck, Richard Saur, J. Stuart Wolf, James E. Montie, Short-Term Health Outcome Differences Between Robotic and Conventional Radical Prostatectomy Urology. ,vol. 70, pp. 945- 949 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.06.1120