An unbiased prospective report of perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

作者: Michael S. Lasser , Joseph Renzulli , George A. Turini , George Haleblian , Harry C. Sax

DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2009.09.082

关键词:

摘要: Objectives To analyze and classified our single-institution experience with the perioperative complications associated robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP). Methods A total of 239 patients a mean age 60.6 years were evaluated (January 2007 to June 2008). Data collected through an institutional review board–approved blinded prospective database by independent third party committee. The data-points accrued set forth 5-member panel including 3 robotic urological surgeons (J. R., G. H., P.), chief general surgery (H. S.), member hospital's outcomes Modified Clavien system was used grade complications, I II representing minor III, IV, V major complications. Results Of patients, 198 (82.9%) had uneventful postoperative course, defined as discharged home from hospital within 2 days postoperatively no unscheduled procedures/studies/hospital admissions or emergency room visits. On remaining 41 55 found. these, 24 I, 17 II, 7 IIIa, 5 IIIb, 1 IVa, There mortality (0.4%) attributed pulmonary embolism on autopsy. Blood loss data revealed intraoperative transfusion 9 (3.8%) transfusions. Conclusions RALRP is complication rates 5.0% 14.6%, respectively. Prospective are lacking in published data. Our prospective, unbiased provide important tool help counsel prostatectomy.

参考文章(13)
John M. Corman, Paul M. Kozlowski, Lester S. Borden, Christopher R. Porter, Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system. Canadian Journal of Urology. ,vol. 14, pp. 3499- 3501 ,(2007)
S. M. Strasberg, P. A. Clavien, Juan Ramon Sanabria, Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. ,vol. 111, pp. 518- 526 ,(1992)
David P. Wood, Ryan Schulte, Rodney L. Dunn, Brent K. Hollenbeck, Richard Saur, J. Stuart Wolf, James E. Montie, Short-Term Health Outcome Differences Between Robotic and Conventional Radical Prostatectomy Urology. ,vol. 70, pp. 945- 949 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.06.1120
WILLIAM J. CATALONA, GUSTAVO F. CARVALHAL, DOUGLAS E. MAGER, DEBORAH S. SMITH, POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATION RATES IN 1,870 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 162, pp. 433- 438 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68578-3
VIPUL R. PATEL, A.S. TULLY, R. HOLMES, J. LINDSAY, ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE COMMUNITY SETTING—THE LEARNING CURVE AND BEYOND: INITIAL 200 CASES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 174, pp. 269- 272 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.JU.0000162082.12962.40
Roy Berryhill, Jay Jhaveri, Rajiv Yadav, Robert Leung, Sandhya Rao, Assaad El-Hakim, Ashutosh Tewari, Robotic Prostatectomy: A Review of Outcomes Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Approaches Urology. ,vol. 72, pp. 15- 23 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.12.038
Daniel Dindo, Nicolas Demartines, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 240, pp. 205- 213 ,(2004) , 10.1097/01.SLA.0000133083.54934.AE
Ozdal Dillioglugil, Bryan D Leibman, Neville S Leibman, Michael W Kattan, Alejandro L Rosas, Peter T Scardino, None, Risk Factors for Complications and Morbidity After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 157, pp. 1760- 1767 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64856-0
Boris Fischer, Nadja Engel, Jean-Luc Fehr, Hubert John, Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. World Journal of Urology. ,vol. 26, pp. 595- 602 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00345-008-0287-7