Toward a Method for Exposing and Elucidating Ethical Issues with Human Cognitive Enhancement Technologies.

作者: Bjørn Hofmann

DOI: 10.1007/S11948-016-9791-0

关键词: Ethical issuesContent analysisManagement scienceBioethicsCognitionEmerging technologiesDeliberationFormative assessmentEngineeringHealth technology

摘要: To develop a method for exposing and elucidating ethical issues with human cognitive enhancement (HCE). The intended use of the is to support facilitate open transparent deliberation decision making respect this emerging technology great potential formative implications individuals society. Literature search identify relevant approaches. Conventional content analysis identified papers methods in order assess their suitability assessing HCE according four selection criteria. Method development. Amendment after pilot testing on smart-glasses. Based three existing approaches health assessment technologies was developed. test smart-glasses, amended. consists six steps guiding list 43 questions. A provides ground work context specific analysis. Widespread use, amendments, further developments are encouraged.

参考文章(46)
Anjan Chatterjee, The ethics of neuroenhancement. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. ,vol. 118, pp. 323- 334 ,(2013) , 10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00027-5
Daniel R. Sarewitz, Thomas H. Karas, Policy implications of technologies for cognitive enhancement Sandia National Laboratories. pp. 267- 285 ,(2007) , 10.2172/901973
L. Hennen, H. Torgersen, S. Bellucci, L. Klüver, D. Bütschi, M. Nentwich, R. van Est, J. van Eijndhoven, F. Gloede, W. Peissl, S. Joss, EUROpTA: European Participatory Technology Assessment - Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making Danish Board of Technology. ,(2000)
Christopher Coenen, Mirjam Schuijff, Martijntje Smits, The Politics of Human Enhancement and the European Union John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 521- 535 ,(2014) , 10.1002/9781444393552.CH37
Arie Rip, Haico te Kulve, Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures. pp. 49- 70 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-8416-4_4
JOHN HARRIS, Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics. ,vol. 25, pp. 102- 111 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-8519.2010.01854.X
Emelie Heintz, Laura Lintamo, Monica Hultcrantz, Stella Jacobson, Ragnar Levi, Christian Munthe, Sofia Tranæus, Pernilla Östlund, Lars Sandman, FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES: THE SBU APPROACH International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. ,vol. 31, pp. 124- 130 ,(2015) , 10.1017/S0266462315000264
Bjørn Hofmann, Kristin Bakke Lysdahl, Sigrid Droste, Evaluation of ethical aspects in health technology assessment: more methods than applications? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. ,vol. 15, pp. 5- 7 ,(2015) , 10.1586/14737167.2015.990886
Cynthia Forlini, Wayne Hall, Bruce Maxwell, Simon M Outram, Peter B Reiner, Dimitris Repantis, Maartje Schermer, Eric Racine, Navigating the enhancement landscape. Ethical issues in research on cognitive enhancers for healthy individuals EMBO Reports. ,vol. 14, pp. 123- 128 ,(2013) , 10.1038/EMBOR.2012.225
Filippo Santoni de Sio, Nadira Faulmüller, Nicole A Vincent, How cognitive enhancement can change our duties. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. ,vol. 8, pp. 131- 131 ,(2014) , 10.3389/FNSYS.2014.00131