Interpretation pitfalls of vascular laboratory testing

作者: Dennis F. Bandyk

DOI: 10.1053/J.SEMVASCSURG.2013.11.004

关键词: CuffHemodynamicsBlood pressureRadiologyMedicineBlood flowDuplex ultrasonographyPlethysmographOcclusionVascular disease

摘要: Vascular laboratory testing of patients with arterial and venous disease requires a thorough understanding the diagnostic instrumentation, anatomy, blood flow hemodynamics. Diagnostic typically uses both Doppler ultrasound, especially duplex ultrasonography, alone or in combination air plethysmography, to identify classify vascular disease. In symptomatic peripheral disease, clinical evaluation is enhanced by noninvasive testing, for many can provide sufficient information proceed medical treatment intervention without additional confirmatory imaging studies. The accuracy depends on precision reproducibility measurement (eg, pressure, pulse contour, velocity, volume rate). For example, ankle systolic pressure cannot always be assumed accurate because test result affected number factors, including biological variability, cuff size placement, examiner skill, presence tibial artery calcification preventing occlusion. Interpretation all an appreciation limitations, pitfalls, artifacts modality. errors incorrect diagnosis subsequent decision making.

参考文章(9)
D. E. Strandness, Duplex scanning in vascular disorders Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ,(1990)
K.Wayne Johnston, Marilyn Y. Hosang, David F. Andrews, Reproducibility of noninvasive vascular laboratory measurements of the peripheral circulation Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 6, pp. 147- 151 ,(1987) , 10.1067/MVA.1987.AVS0060147
Dennis J. Wright, Alexander D. Shepard, Michalene McPharlin, Calvin B. Ernst, Pitfalls in lower extremity venous duplex scanning Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 11, pp. 675- 679 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0741-5214(90)90213-T
S C Rose, W J Zwiebel, B D Nelson, D L Priest, R A Knighton, J W Brown, P F Lawrence, B M Stults, J C Reading, F J Miller, Symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: accuracy, limitations, and role of color duplex flow imaging in diagnosis. Radiology. ,vol. 175, pp. 639- 644 ,(1990) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.175.3.2188293
Edward G. Grant, Carol B. Benson, Gregory L. Moneta, Andrei V. Alexandrov, J. Dennis Baker, Edward I. Bluth, Barbara A. Carroll, Michael Eliasziw, John Gocke, Barbara S. Hertzberg, Sandra Katanick, Laurence Needleman, John Pellerito, Joseph F. Polak, Kenneth S. Rholl, Douglas L. Wooster, R. Eugene Zierler, Carotid artery stenosis: Gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis-society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference Radiology. ,vol. 229, pp. 340- 346 ,(2003) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2292030516
Russell H. Samson, Dennis F. Bandyk, David P. Showalter, Jonathan P. Yunis, Carotid Endarterectomy Based on Duplex Ultrasonography: A Safe Approach Associated with Long-term Stroke Prevention Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 34, pp. 125- 136 ,(2000) , 10.1177/153857440003400204
Ted Kohler, Yves Langlois, Ghislaine O. Roederer, David J. Phillips, Kirk W. Beach, Jean Primozich, Ramona Lawrence, Stephen C. Nicholls, D.E. Strandness, SOURCES OF VARIABILITY IN CAROTID DUPLEX EXAMINATION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 571- 576 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0301-5629(85)90027-4
Kirk W. Beach, Daniel F. Leotta, Physics and instrumentation for duplex scanning Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP). ,(2012)