Addressing temporal considerations in life cycle assessment

作者: Didier Beloin-Saint-Pierre , Ariane Albers , Arnaud Hélias , Ligia Tiruta-Barna , Peter Fantke

DOI: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.140700

关键词: Life cycle impact assessmentRepresentativeness heuristicRisk analysis (engineering)Data collectionCommon groundLife-cycle assessmentGlossaryTemporal resolutionLife cycle inventoryComputer science

摘要: Abstract In life cycle assessment (LCA), temporal considerations are usually lost during the inventory calculation, resulting in an aggregated “snapshot” of potential impacts. Disregarding such has previously been underlined as important source uncertainty, but a growing number approaches have developed to tackle this issue. Nevertheless, their adoption by LCA practitioners is still uncommon, which raises concerns about representativeness current results. Furthermore, lack consistency can be observed used terms for discussions on considerations. The purpose review thus search common ground and identify implementation challenges while also proposing development pathways. This paper introduces glossary most frequently related build understanding key concepts facilitate discussions. A performed solutions different phases (goal scope definition, analysis impact assessment), analysing each consideration its relevant conceptual developments level operationalisation. We then present stepwise approach pathways address dynamic (DLCA). Three focal areas integrating within framework discussed: i) define over distributions emissions occurring, ii) use calendar-specific information model systems associated impacts, iii) select appropriate resolution describe variations flows characterisation factors. Addressing more DLCA expected reduce uncertainties increase results, possible trade-offs between additional data collection efforts increased value results from DLCAs should kept mind.

参考文章(194)
Pierre Collet, Arnaud Hélias, Laurent Lardon, Jean-Philippe Steyer, Time and Life Cycle Assessment: How to Take Time into Account in the Inventory Step? Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 119- 130 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_12
Matthias Finkbeiner, Robert Ackermann, Vanessa Bach, Markus Berger, Gerhard Brankatschk, Ya-Ju Chang, Marina Grinberg, Annekatrin Lehmann, Julia Martínez-Blanco, Nikolay Minkov, Sabrina Neugebauer, René Scheumann, Laura Schneider, Kirana Wolf, Challenges in Life Cycle Assessment: An Overview of Current Gaps and Research Needs Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 207- 258 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_7
Marcelle C. McManus, Caroline M. Taylor, The changing nature of life cycle assessment. Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 82, pp. 13- 26 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2015.04.024
Stefanie Hellweg, Thomas B. Hofstetter, Konrad Hungerbuhler, Discounting and the environment should current impacts be weighted differently than impacts harming future generations International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 8- 18 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02978744
John Ochsendorf, Alexander Loijos, Mehdi Akbarian, Nicholas Santero, Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Pavement Life Cycle MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub. ,(2011)
A.B. Bisinella de Faria, M. Spérandio, A. Ahmadi, L. Tiruta-Barna, Evaluation of new alternatives in wastewater treatment plants based on dynamic modelling and life cycle assessment (DM-LCA). Water Research. ,vol. 84, pp. 99- 111 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2015.06.048
Peter Fantke, Olivier Jolliet, Life cycle human health impacts of 875 pesticides International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 21, pp. 722- 733 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11367-015-0910-Y
Rita Garcia, Jeremy Gregory, Fausto Freire, Dynamic fleet-based life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment of the introduction of electric vehicles in the Portuguese light-duty fleet International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 20, pp. 1287- 1299 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11367-015-0921-8