Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences.

作者: Valeria Ramírez-Castañeda

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0238372

关键词: Impact factorHegemonyPublishingSalaryReading comprehensionPublic relationsEnglish grammarPublicationPolitical scienceScience communication

摘要: The success of a scientist depends on their production scientific papers and the impact factor journal in which they publish. Because most major journals are published English, is related to publishing this language. Currently, 98% publications science written including researchers from English as Foreign Language (EFL) countries. Colombia among countries with lowest proficiency world. Thus, understanding disadvantages that Colombians face crucial reducing global inequality science. This paper quantifies result language hegemony by examining additional costs communicating creates articles. It was identified more than 90% articles Colombian second financial doctoral students results problems reading comprehension, writing ease time, anxiety. Rejection or revision because grammar reported 43.5% students, 33% elected not attend international conferences meetings due mandatory use oral presentations. Finally, translation/editing services reviewed, cost per article between one-quarter one-half monthly salary Colombia. Of particular note, we positive correlation higher socioeconomic origin researcher. Overall, study exhibits negative consequences preserves gap Although having common important for communication, generating multilinguistic alternatives would promote diversity while conserving communication channel. Such an effort should come different actors fall solely EFL researchers.

参考文章(38)
Gideon Parchomovsky, Publish or Perish Michigan Law Review. ,vol. 98, pp. 926- 952 ,(2000) , 10.2307/1290335
Gonzalo Ordonez-Matamoros, Susan E. Cozzens, Margarita Garcia-Luque, North-South and South-South research collaboration: What differences does it make for developing countries? - the case of Colombia 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy. pp. 1- 10 ,(2011) , 10.1109/ACSIP.2011.6064479
Cristina Guardiano, M. Elena Favilla, Emilia Calaresu, Stereotypes about English as the language of science Aila Review. ,vol. 20, pp. 28- 52 ,(2007) , 10.1075/AILA.20.05GUA
Laura-Mihaela Muresan, Carmen Pérez-Llantada, English for research publication and dissemination in bi-/multiliterate environments: The case of Romanian academics Journal of English for Academic Purposes. ,vol. 13, pp. 53- 64 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JEAP.2013.10.009
Miguel Clavero, "Awkward wording. Rephrase": linguistic injustice in ecological journals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 25, pp. 552- 553 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2010.07.001
R Coates, Language and publication in "Cardiovascular Research" articles. Cardiovascular Research. ,vol. 53, pp. 279- 285 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00530-2
Sarah J. Whatmore, Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise Progress in Human Geography. ,vol. 33, pp. 587- 598 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0309132509339841
John Flowerdew, Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong Journal of Second Language Writing. ,vol. 8, pp. 123- 145 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80125-8