Towards Innovative Solutions through Integrative Futures Analysis - Preliminary qualitative scenarios
作者： W Cosgrove , G Fischer , M Floerke , E Hizsnyik , P Magnuszewski
DOI:
关键词: Management science 、 Futures contract 、 Set (psychology) 、 Confusion 、 Representation (mathematics) 、 Process (engineering) 、 Geography 、 The Conceptual Framework
摘要: This report presents preliminary results of developing qualitative global water scenarios. The scenarios are developed to be consistent with the underlying Shared Socio- Economic Pathways (SSPs). In this way different stakeholders in contexts (climate, water) can presented set avoiding confusion and increasing policy impact. Water based on conceptual framework that has been developd specifically for effort. provides clear representation important dimensions areas Nature, Economy Society embedded them. These critical used describe future changes a all Three SSP1, SSP2 SSP3 respectively. Hydro-economic classes introduced further differentiate within economic conditions specific regions and/or countries. process building these assumptions report, number challenges have met. conclusions section summarized possible ways tackling them described.
iiasa.ac.at参考文章(8)
Elmar Kriegler, Brian C. O’Neill, Stephane Hallegatte, Tom Kram, Robert J. Lempert, Richard H. Moss, Thomas Wilbanks, The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 22, pp. 807- 822 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2012.05.005
Detlef P. van Vuuren, Keywan Riahi, Richard Moss, Jae Edmonds, Allison Thomson, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Tom Kram, Frans Berkhout, Rob Swart, Anthony Janetos, Steven K. Rose, Nigel Arnell, A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 22, pp. 21- 35 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2011.08.002
Detlef P. van Vuuren, Marcel T.J. Kok, Bastien Girod, Paul L. Lucas, Bert de Vries, Scenarios in Global Environmental Assessments: Key characteristics and lessons for future use Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 22, pp. 884- 895 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2012.06.001
E A Parson, Useful global-change scenarios: current issues and challenges Environmental Research Letters. ,vol. 3, pp. 045016- ,(2008) , 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045016
Axel Volkery, Teresa Ribeiro, Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 76, pp. 1198- 1207 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2009.07.009
Richard H. Moss, Jae A. Edmonds, Kathy A. Hibbard, Martin R. Manning, Steven K. Rose, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Timothy R. Carter, Seita Emori, Mikiko Kainuma, Tom Kram, Gerald A. Meehl, John F. B. Mitchell, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Keywan Riahi, Steven J. Smith, Ronald J. Stouffer, Allison M. Thomson, John P. Weyant, Thomas J. Wilbanks, The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment Nature. ,vol. 463, pp. 747- 756 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NATURE08823
Lutz E Schlange, Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation Futures. ,vol. 29, pp. 877- 880 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0016-3287(97)90139-7
David Grey, Claudia W. Sadoff, Sink or Swim? Water security for growth and development Water Policy. ,vol. 9, pp. 545- 571 ,(2007) , 10.2166/WP.2007.021