N-Defendant Litigation and Settlement: The Impact of Joint and Several Liability

作者: Lewis A. Kornhauser , Keith T. Takeda

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1019602

关键词: TortSettlement (litigation)PlaintiffStochastic gameJoint and several liabilityNash equilibriumActuarial scienceLiabilityEconomicsCoalition-proof Nash equilibrium

摘要: This article generalizes the analysis of settlement under joint and several liability from lawsuits involving one plaintiff two defendants to those n≥2 defendants. We demonstrate that, depending upon correlation outcomes among defendants, but regardless distribution shares, may encourage plaintiffs select some for litigation while settling with remaining. In particular, liability, when each defendant is grouped others sharing correlated outcomes, plaintiff's probability success against any sufficiently high, we show in all Nash equilibrium, litigates group smallest share settles other There are a continuum equilibria they payoff-equivalent up permutation. Plaintiff's payoff identical equilibria; only payoffs members within permuted. also high success, this result holds even allowed form coalitions, derive set offers behaviorally unique coalition proof equilibrium; as before, these induce

参考文章(19)
Reinhard Selten, John C. Harsanyi, A general theory of equilibrium selection in games ,(1988)
Mark Budden, Lorrie Homan, Chris Pretz, Paul Hadavas, Generating Valid 4 ◊ 4 Correlation Matrices ,(2007)
K. E. Spier, Settlement with Multiple Plaintiffs: The Role of Insolvency Journal of Law Economics & Organization. ,vol. 18, pp. 295- 323 ,(2002) , 10.1093/JLEO/18.2.295
B.Douglas Bernheim, Bezalel Peleg, Michael D Whinston, Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibria I. Concepts Journal of Economic Theory. ,vol. 42, pp. 1- 12 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0022-0531(87)90099-8
Marcel Kahan, The incentive effects of settlements under joint and several liability International Review of Law and Economics. ,vol. 16, pp. 389- 395 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0144-8188(96)00033-6
Yeon-Koo Che, Equilibrium formation of class action suits Journal of Public Economics. ,vol. 62, pp. 339- 361 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0047-2727(95)01546-9
Frank H. Easterbrook, William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner, Contribution among Antitrust Defendants: A Legal and Economic Analysis The Journal of Law and Economics. ,vol. 23, pp. 331- 370 ,(1980) , 10.1086/466964
Kathryn E. Spier, The Dynamics of Pretrial Negotiation The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 59, pp. 93- 108 ,(1992) , 10.2307/2297927
Nicholas Dopuch, Daniel E. Ingberman, Ronald R. King, An experimental investigation of multi-defendant bargaining in ‘joint and several’ and proportionate liability regimes Journal of Accounting and Economics. ,vol. 23, pp. 189- 221 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00005-0
Daniel M. Klerman, Settling Multidefendant Lawsuits: The Advantage of Conditional Setoff Rules Social Science Research Network. ,(1995)