Perspectives of Australian policy-makers on the potential benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance - a modified Delphi survey.

作者: Chris Degeling , Jane Johnson , Gwendolyn L. Gilbert

DOI: 10.1186/S12961-019-0440-3

关键词: Health policyBusinessPublic healthCommunicable diseaseHealth services researchDelphi methodPublic relationsSocial mediaPublic health surveillancePublic trust

摘要: Event-based social media monitoring and pathogen whole genome sequencing (WGS) will enhance communicable disease surveillance research systems. If linked electronically scanned systematically, the information provided by these technologies could be mined to uncover new epidemiological patterns associations much faster than traditional public health approaches. The benefits of earlier outbreak detection are significant, but implementation opposed in absence a licence or if ethical legal concerns not addressed. A three-phase mixed-method Delphi survey with Australian policy-makers, practitioners lawyers (n = 44) was conducted explore areas consensus disagreement over (1) key policy practical issues raised introduction novel programmes; (2) most significant likely risks from using content WGS investigations. Panellists agreed that integration into systems issues, including impacts on personal privacy, medicolegal potential for unintended consequences. Notably, their focused how should used, rather data collected. held users expect posts monitored interests health, those platforms contact identified individuals controversial. conditions appropriate use investigations also contentious. Key differences amongst participants included necessity consent before testing data-linkage, thresholds action, importance harms commercial entities. erosion trust seen as risk systematic technologies. Enhancing social-media may cause controversy. challenge is determine then codify used such balance between individual community benefit widely accepted. Participants clear guidelines address need developed consultation relevant experts broader public.

参考文章(47)
Mirko Bagaric, Carolyn Doyle, Privacy Law in Australia ,(2005)
Eric M Meslin, C D'arcy J Holman, Fiona Stanley, Judy Allen, Privacy protectionism and health information: Is there any redress for harms to health? Journal of law and medicine. ,vol. 21, pp. 473- 485 ,(2013)
Harold Sackman, Delphi critique : expert opinion, forecasting, and group process UT Back-in-Print Service. ,(1975)
Erio Ziglio, Michael Adler, Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health Published in <b>1996</b> in London by Kingsley. ,(1996)
Julie A. Pavlin, Syndromic surveillance for infectious diseases John Wiley & Sons Ltd. pp. 470- 481 ,(2013) , 10.1002/9781118543504.CH38
John Besser, Use of Molecular Epidemiology in Infectious Disease Surveillance Infectious Disease Surveillance, Second Edition. pp. 393- 407 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470692097.CH30
Frédéric Varone, Michael Hill, The Public Policy Process ,(2005)