作者: Luz Robles , Enrique López , Xavier Salazar , Kyle B. Boone , Debra F. Glaser
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1039961
关键词: Audiology 、 Malingering 、 Recall 、 Psychology 、 Large sample 、 Social psychology 、 Word recognition 、 False positive paradox 、 Neurocognitive 、 Test (assessment) 、 Intrusion
摘要: The current study provides specificity data on a large sample (n = 115) of young to middle-aged, male, monolingual Spanish speakers lower educational level and low acculturation mainstream US culture for four neurocognitive performance validity tests (PVTs): the Dot Counting, b Test, Rey Word Recognition, 15-Item Plus Recognition. Individuals with 0 6 years education performed more poorly than did participants 7 10 several scores (combination equation, recall intrusion errors, recognition false positives), Recognition total correct, E-score omission errors but no effect was observed Counting Test scores. Cutoff are provided that maintain approximately 90% subgroups separately. Some these cutoffs match, or even stringent than, those recommended use in test takers who primarily Caucasian, tested English, have...