Topographic and Tomographic Properties of Forme Fruste Keratoconus Corneas

作者: Alain Saad , Damien Gatinel

DOI: 10.1167/IOVS.10-5369

关键词: Forme frusteKeratomileusisDiscriminant function analysisSurgeryLASIKOphthalmologyCorneaKeratoconusMedicineReceiver operating characteristicCorneal topography

摘要: PURPOSE. To investigate the efficacy of topography and tomography indices combined in discriminant functions to detect mild ectatic corneas. METHODS. The authors retrospectively reviewed data 143 eyes separated into three groups by Corneal Navigator OPD scanning system (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan): normal (N; LASIK surgery with a 2-year follow-up; n 72), forme fruste keratoconus (N contralateral KC; FFKC; 40), KC (n 31). Topography indices, corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP), anterior posterior curvature profiles were obtained Orbscan IIz (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Rochester, NY). percentage increase (PTI) from thinnest point periphery, variation (PVAK), calculated compared Kruskal-Wallis test. usefulness these discriminate among was assessed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS. Posterior elevation (TP), all positions CTSP, PTI for distances TP, PVAK 5- 7-mm distance TP significantly different FFKC N group. between reached an area under ROC 0.98 0.99, respectively. maximum central most important contributors function. CONCLUSIONS. Indices generated measurements over entire cornea centered on can identify very forms ectasia undetected Placido-based neural network program. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5546‐5555) DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-5369

参考文章(43)
Perry S. Binder, Risk factors for ectasia after LASIK. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 34, pp. 2010- 2011 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JCRS.2008.08.035
Renato Ambrósio, Ruiz Simonato Alonso, Allan Luz, Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde, Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect keratoconus Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 32, pp. 1851- 1859 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCRS.2006.06.025
Can true monocular keratoconus occur Clinical and Experimental Optometry. ,vol. 87, ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1444-0938.2004.TB03161.X
Stephen D Klyce, Michael D Karon, Michael K Smolek, Screening patients with the corneal navigator. Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 21, pp. 617- 622 ,(2005) , 10.3928/1081-597X-20050902-12
M Amsler, [The "forme fruste" of keratoconus]. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. ,vol. 73, pp. 842- 843 ,(1961)
Peter J McDonnell, Yaron S Rabinowitz, Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 400- 408 ,(1989) , 10.3928/1081-597X-19891101-10
S D Klyce, N Maeda, M K Smolek, Neural network classification of corneal topography. Preliminary demonstration Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 36, pp. 1327- 1335 ,(1995)
J. Bühren, C. Kühne, T. Kohnen, Wavefront analysis for the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus Ophthalmologe. ,vol. 103, pp. 783- 790 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00347-006-1394-8