Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models

作者: James Price , Ilkka Keppo

DOI: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2017.03.065

关键词: Robust decision-makingConstraint (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationPrimary energyPortfolioManagement scienceElectricityUncertainty analysisEngineeringConsumption (economics)Stability (learning theory)

摘要: In this study we describe a novel formulation of the so-called modelling to generate alternatives (MGA) methodology and use it explore near cost optimal solution space global energy-environment-economy model TIAM-UCL. Our implementation specifically aims find maximally different energy system transition pathways assess extent their diversity in region. From can determine stability results implied by least pathway which turn allows us both identify whether there are any consistent insights that emerge across MGA iterations while at same time highlighting systems very similar look different. It is critical such an uncertainty analysis communicated policy makers aid robust decision making. To demonstrate technique apply two scenarios, business as usual (BAU) case climate run. For former significant variability primary carrier consumption then projects further into leading to, for example, large differences portfolio fuels used emissions from electricity sector. When imposing constraint find, general, less than BAU case. Consistent do with oil transport being finding all scenarios and, mitigation case, sector seen reliably decarbonise before industry total permitted increase. Finally, compare our Hop-Skip-Jump formulation, also seeks obtain solutions, that, when applied way, identifies more diverse latter.

参考文章(54)
E Trutnevyte, N Strachan, Nearly perfect and poles apart: investment strategies into the UK power system until 2050 In: (Proceedings) International Energy Workshop 2013. (2013). ,(2013)
Mark Howells, Holger Rogner, Neil Strachan, Charles Heaps, Hillard Huntington, Socrates Kypreos, Alison Hughes, Semida Silveira, Joe DeCarolis, Morgan Bazillian, Alexander Roehrl, OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System: An introduction to its ethos, structure and development Energy Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 5850- 5870 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.06.033
Barry Anderson, Emanuele Borgonovo, Marzio Galeotti, Roberto Roson, Uncertainty in climate change modeling : can global sensitivity analysis be of help? Risk Analysis. ,vol. 34, pp. 271- 293 ,(2014) , 10.1111/RISA.12117
Ilkka Keppo, Bob van der Zwaan, The Impact of Uncertainty in Climate Targets and CO2 Storage Availability on Long-Term Emissions Abatement Environmental Modeling & Assessment. ,vol. 17, pp. 177- 191 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10666-011-9283-1
Brian C. O’Neill, Elmar Kriegler, Keywan Riahi, Kristie L. Ebi, Stephane Hallegatte, Timothy R. Carter, Ritu Mathur, Detlef P. van Vuuren, A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways Climatic Change. ,vol. 122, pp. 387- 400 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S10584-013-0905-2
Enrica De Cian, Tavoni Massimo, Mitigation Portfolio and Policy Instruments When Hedging Against Climate Policy and Technology Uncertainty Environmental Modeling & Assessment. ,vol. 17, pp. 123- 136 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10666-011-9279-X
David L. McCollum, Volker Krey, Keywan Riahi, An integrated approach to energy sustainability Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 1, pp. 428- 429 ,(2011) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE1297
Steve Pye, Nagore Sabio, Neil Strachan, An integrated systematic analysis of uncertainties in UK energy transition pathways Energy Policy. ,vol. 87, pp. 673- 684 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2014.12.031
Sonja Peterson, Uncertainty and economic analysis of climate change: A survey of approaches and findings Environmental Modeling & Assessment. ,vol. 11, pp. 1- 17 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S10666-005-9014-6