Investment appraisal of cost-optimal and near-optimal pathways for the UK electricity sector transition to 2050

作者: Francis G.N. Li , Evelina Trutnevyte

DOI: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2016.12.047

关键词:

摘要: Deep decarbonisation of the electricity sector is central to achieving United Kingdom’s (UK) climate policy targets for 2050 and meeting its international commitments under Paris Agreement. While overall strategy decarbonising energy system has been well established in previous studies, there remain deep uncertainties around total investment cost requirements power system. The future critical importance because low carbon may create significant opportunities emissions reduction buildings transport. A key application quantitative analysis using models explore how much needs be mobilised transition. However, past estimates transition costs UK have focused only on 2030 rather than consider a relatively narrow range uncertainties. This paper addresses this important research gap. government's main whole economy model linked that employs an advanced approach uncertainty analysis, combining Monte Carlo simulation with Modelling-to-Generate Alternatives (MGA), producing 800 different scenario pathways. These pathways simultaneously policy, technology costs. results show No Climate Policy, installed generation capacities are found 60–75 GW, while 80% Reduction GHG Emissions, between 100 GW 130 plant required. Meeting also increase new generation. interquartile cumulative investments Policy ranges from £60bn £75bn, approximately double £110bn - £140bn. exercise demonstrates evaluation, yielding insights practice both internationally.

参考文章(81)
PE Dodds, HE Daly, B Fais, The UK TIMES Model: UKTM Documentation : UCL Energy Institute.. ,(2014)
J Skea, N Strachan, P Ekins, G Anandarajah, I Keppo, W Usher, The UK Energy System in 2050: Comparing Low-Carbon, Resilient Scenarios (UKERC Report UKERC/RR ). UK Energy Research Centre: London, UK.. ,(2013)
Sergios Theodoridis, Monte Carlo Methods Machine Learning#R##N#A Bayesian and Optimization Perspective. pp. 707- 744 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-801522-3.00014-8
Evelina Trutnevyte, Neil Strachan, Paul E. Dodds, Danny Pudjianto, Goran Strbac, Synergies and trade-offs between governance and costs in electricity system transition Energy Policy. ,vol. 85, pp. 170- 181 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2015.06.003
Robert Lempert, Steven Popper, Steven Bankes, Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis RAND Corporation. ,(2003) , 10.7249/MR1626
Neil Strachan, Nick Hughes, Paul Ekins, Gabrial Anandarajah, Ramachandran Kannan, Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Energy Systems Modelling UKERC: London.. ,(2008)
Jingcheng Shi, Wenying Chen, Xiang Yin, Modelling building’s decarbonization with application of China TIMES model☆ Applied Energy. ,vol. 162, pp. 1303- 1312 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.06.056
William Blyth, Rory McCarthy, Robert Gross, None, Financing the UK power sector: Is the money available? Energy Policy. ,vol. 87, pp. 607- 622 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2015.08.028
Hongjun Zhang, Wenying Chen, Weilong Huang, TIMES modelling of transport sector in China and USA: Comparisons from a decarbonization perspective☆ Applied Energy. ,vol. 162, pp. 1505- 1514 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.08.124
Mika Goto, Toshiyuki Sueyoshi, Electric power market reform in Japan after Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant disaster: Issues and future direction International Journal of Energy Sector Management. ,vol. 9, pp. 336- 360 ,(2015) , 10.1108/IJESM-05-2014-0009