Consequences of selecting technology pathways on cumulative carbon dioxide emissions for the United Kingdom

作者: Simon H. Roberts , Barney D. Foran , Colin J. Axon , Benjamin S. Warr , Nigel H. Goddard

DOI: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2018.06.078

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The UK has an ambitious target of 80% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, to be reached using a series ‘carbon budgets’ aid policy development. Current energy systems modelling methods do not explore, or are unable account for, physical (thermodynamic) limits the rate change infrastructure. power generation sector variety technological options for this low-carbon transition. We compare physically constrained scenarios that accentuate either capture and storage, fastest plausible nuclear new build, build offshore wind. set these context UK’s legislated fifth budget, which comprehensive range measures with respect business-as-usual. framework our scenario comparison uses novel system dynamics model substantiate policy’s ability meet 2035 targets while maintaining financial productivity socially expected employment levels. For programme we find even if it stays on track is more expensive than wind delays reductions. This affects cumulative impacts contribute international climate targets. If cancellation occur deployment programmes storage technologies suggest electricity decarbonisation can met fast growth no

参考文章(35)
Andrea Herbst, Felipe Toro, Felix Reitze, Eberhard Jochem, Introduction to Energy Systems Modelling Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics. ,vol. 148, pp. 111- 135 ,(2012) , 10.1007/BF03399363
John Barton, Lloyd Davies, Ben Dooley, Timothy J. Foxon, Stuart Galloway, Geoffrey P. Hammond, Áine O’Grady, Elizabeth Robertson, Murray Thomson, Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity system:Comparing scenarios and technology implications Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 82, pp. 2779- 2790 ,(2018) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2017.10.007
Nick Hughes, Neil Strachan, Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios Energy Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 6056- 6065 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.05.061
Subhes C Bhattacharyya, Govinda R Timilsina, Modelling Energy Demand of Developing Countries: Are the Specific Features Adequately Captured? Energy Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 1979- 1990 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.11.079
Catalina Spataru, Paul Drummond, Eleni Zafeiratou, Mark Barrett, Long-term scenarios for reaching climate targets and energy security in UK Sustainable Cities and Society. ,vol. 17, pp. 95- 109 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.SCS.2015.03.010
Neil Strachan, Ramachandran Kannan, Hybrid modelling of long-term carbon reduction scenarios for the UK Energy Economics. ,vol. 30, pp. 2947- 2963 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2008.04.009
PAUL EKINS, GABRIAL ANANDARAJAH, NEIL STRACHAN, Towards a low-carbon economy: scenarios and policies for the UK Climate Policy. ,vol. 11, pp. 865- 882 ,(2011) , 10.3763/CPOL.2010.0126
Patricia Allen, Tim Chatterton, Carbon reduction scenarios for 2050: An explorative analysis of public preferences Energy Policy. ,vol. 63, pp. 796- 808 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.08.079
Peter G. Taylor, Paul Upham, Will McDowall, David Christopherson, Energy model, boundary object and societal lens: 35 years of the MARKAL model in the UK Energy research and social science. ,vol. 4, pp. 32- 41 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ERSS.2014.08.007