Regional cooperation for European seas: Governance models in support of the implementation of the MSFD

作者: Jan van Tatenhove , Jesper Raakjaer , Judith van Leeuwen , Luc van Hoof

DOI: 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2014.02.020

关键词: AmbiguityCorporate governanceEx-anteMarine Strategy Framework DirectiveEnvironmental resource managementAllianceProcess (engineering)Environmental economicsStakeholderStakeholder analysisBusiness

摘要: During the implementation process of Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), Member States are expected to cooperate and coordinate at regional sea level as wells arrange stakeholder involvement. However, MSFD does not specify any governing structures do so. The aim this paper is address these key challenges by developing four governance models for cooperation assess their impact on performance. based building blocks involvement (low or high) decision-making power (binding non-binding decisions): (1) Cross-border platforms; (2) Regional Sea Convention-PLUS; (3) Advisory Alliance (4) Assembly. Secondly, will an ex ante assessment how alternative have criteria performance are: (a) costs set up run a model; (b) capacity cooperate; (c) policy coordination; (d) institutional ambiguity; (e) drift. In addition expert judgement (i.e. scientists WP7 ODEMM project), 4 roundtable discussions been undertaken in which stakeholders from seas did models. main conclusion that increasing participation, much desired development organisation marine management expressed community, increase making process. If participation embedded wider setting directly related degree decisions taken binding, lead more smoothly running model.

参考文章(19)
Stig S. Gezelius, Troels Jacob Hegland, Hilary Palevsky, Jesper Raakjær, The Politics of Implementation in Resource Conservation: comparing the EU/Denmark and Norway Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 207- 229 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-8628-1_7
Astrid Hendriksen, Charlène Jouanneau, Rebecca Koss, Jesper Raakjaer, Fishing for opinions: Stakeholder views on MSFD implementation in European Seas Marine Policy. ,vol. 50, pp. 353- 363 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2014.03.009
Sherry R. Arnstein, A Ladder of Citizen Participation Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 35, pp. 216- 224 ,(1969) , 10.1080/01944366908977225
Markus Salomon, Miriam Dross, Challenges in cross-sectoral marine protection in Europe Marine Policy. ,vol. 42, pp. 142- 149 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2013.02.012
Jurian Edelenbos, Pieter-Jan Klok, Jan van Tatenhove, The Institutional Embedding of Interactive Policy Making: Insights From a Comparative Research Based on Eight Interactive Projects in the Netherlands The American Review of Public Administration. ,vol. 39, pp. 125- 148 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0275074008317157
Jurian Edelenbos, Erik-Hans Klijn, Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. ,vol. 16, pp. 417- 446 ,(2006) , 10.1093/JOPART/MUI049
Judith van Leeuwen, Jesper Raakjaer, Luc van Hoof, Jan van Tatenhove, Ronán Long, Kristen Ounanian, Implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: A policy perspective on regulatory, institutional and stakeholder impediments to effective implementation Marine Policy. ,vol. 50, pp. 325- 330 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2014.03.004
Judith van Leeuwen, Luc van Hoof, Jan van Tatenhove, Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive Marine Policy. ,vol. 36, pp. 636- 643 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2011.10.007
Juliette C. Young, Andrew Jordan, Kate R. Searle, Adam Butler, Daniel S. Chapman, Peter Simmons, Allan D. Watt, Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation Biological Conservation. ,vol. 158, pp. 359- 370 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2012.08.018