Angiotensin II receptor blockers

作者: Amy Barreras , Cheryle Gurk-Turner

DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2003.11927893

关键词: TelmisartanLosartanIrbesartanCombination therapyOlmesartanMedicineHeart failureValsartanPharmacologyCandesartan

摘要: The ARBs have very similar clinical profiles. They do, however, different pharmacokinetic profiles, which may lead to some differences in efficacy. newer agents irbesartan, candesartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan longer half-lives durations of action than the older losartan valsartan (5). Twenty-four–hour blood pressure control could be more readily achievable with agents. Losartan need administered twice daily patients needing greater antihypertensive effects, whereas no added benefit when once daily. Of course, a once-daily product is always preferred. Several double-blind, head-to-head comparative trials evaluated relative efficacy mild moderate hypertension. net result that longer-acting effective at providing 24-hour control. But, as also mentioned, metaanalysis 43 comparing effects found comparable efficacies within ARB class (4, 5). Whether reported are clinically relevant regarding morbidity mortality has not been determined. When evaluating among ARBs, their current future places therapy for unlabeled uses must considered. use heart failure, combination ACE inhibitors alone standard therapy. only studies completed involved long-term follow-up endpoints. Neither agent can replace first-line therapy, but both remain rational alternative unable tolerate inhibitors. Candesartan currently being this same use.

参考文章(14)
Erwin K. Kastrup, James R. Boyd, Sally Gifford, Drug facts and comparisons Facts and Comparisons Division, J.B. Lippincott. ,(1977)
Jo E. Rodgers, J. Herbert Patterson, Angiotensin II-receptor blockers: clinical relevance and therapeutic role American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy. ,vol. 58, pp. 671- 683 ,(2001) , 10.1093/AJHP/58.8.671
Suzanne Oparil, David Williams, Steven G. Chrysant, Thomas C. Marbury, Joel Neutel, Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. Journal of Clinical Hypertension. ,vol. 3, pp. 283- 318 ,(2001) , 10.1111/J.1524-6175.2001.01136.X
Roberto Fogari, Annalisa Zoppi, Amedeo Mugellini, Paola Preti, Alessandra Banderali, Rosa Maria Pesce, Alessandro Vanasia, Comparative efficacy of losartan and valsartan in mild-to-moderate hypertension: Results of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental. ,vol. 60, pp. 195- 206 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0011-393X(00)88515-X
DG Vidt, , WB White, E Ridley, M Rahman, S Harris, J Vendetti, EL Michelson, R Wang, A forced titration study of antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan cilexetil in comparison to losartan: CLAIM Study II. Journal of Human Hypertension. ,vol. 15, pp. 475- 480 ,(2001) , 10.1038/SJ.JHH.1001205
Jay N. Cohn, Gianni Tognoni, A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 345, pp. 1667- 1675 ,(2001) , 10.1056/NEJMOA010713
Roberto Fogari, Amedeo Mugellini, Annalisa Zoppi, Giuseppe Derosa, Andrea Rinaldi, Elena Fogari, Alessandro Vanasia, Paola Preti, Efficacy of losartan, valsartan, and telmisartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental. ,vol. 63, pp. 1- 14 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0011-393X(02)80002-9