Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload

作者: James P. Bliss , Mariea C. Dunn

DOI: 10.1080/001401300421743

关键词:

摘要: The research was conducted to investigate the effect of increasing primary task and alarm workload on mistrust as reflected by performances. A total 126 undergraduate students performed a complex psychomotor battery three times, with number concurrent tasks each time. During their performance, were required react an system (including visual auditory components) questionable reliability. Depending group which participants assigned, presentation rate constituted low-, medium- or high-workload condition. Alarm response data (times, frequencies, accuracies) (tracking error) analyzed assess performance differences function secondary levels. Results generally supported hypotheses: degraded performance. Also, frequencies earlier suggesting that 'probability match' rates results are discussed regard cry-wolf effect, attention theory design.

参考文章(36)
Robert D. Sorkin, Barry H. Kantowitz, Susan C. Kantowitz, Likelihood alarm displays Human Factors. ,vol. 30, pp. 445- 459 ,(1988) , 10.1177/001872088803000406
Robert S. Kennedy, Janet J. Turnage, Mary K. Osteen, Performance of Performance Tests: Comparison of Psychometric Properties of 24 Tests from Two Microcomputer-Based Batteries Defense Technical Information Center. ,(1989) , 10.21236/ADA252353
Neville Moray, Mental workload : its theory and measurement Published in coordination with NATO Scientific Affairs, Plenum Press. ,(1979)
Judy Edworthy, Austin S. Adams, Warning design : a research prospective Taylor & Francis. ,(1996)
Judy Edworthy, Sarah Loxley, Ian Dennis, Improving auditory warning design: relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors. ,vol. 33, pp. 205- 231 ,(1991) , 10.1177/001872089103300206
Christopher D. Wickens, Justin G. Hollands, Simon Banbury, Raja Parasuraman, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance ,(1984)
W.R. Simpson, J.W. Sheppard, Analysis of false alarms during system design national aerospace and electronics conference. pp. 657- 660 ,(1992) , 10.1109/NAECON.1992.220552