Regional differences between the US, Scandinavia, and South Korea in patient demographics and patient-reported outcomes for primary total knee arthroplasty

作者: Nicholas Sauder , Vincent P. Galea , Pakdee Rojanasopondist , Yhan E. Colon Iban , Isabella Soares Florissi

DOI: 10.1007/S00402-019-03286-5

关键词:

摘要: Differences in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patient demographics and clinical outcomes may exist between international regions, yet research is limited. The aim of this study was, therefore, to compare TKA patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores the US, Scandinavia, South Korea. A 398 patients from three regions were assessed: 169 Scandinavia (3 centers), 129 US 100 Korea (2 centers). Regional variation was assessed using Kruskal–Wallis H tests. PROM preoperative, 1-, 3- 5-year visits piecewise linear mixed effect models. PROMs analyzed a numerical rating scale for satisfaction Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Korean oldest (p < 0.001) had highest Charnley class (p < 0.001); BMI Scandinavian lowest preoperative KL grade (p < 0.001). associated with better worse postoperative scores. also moderately lower levels satisfaction. These differences lessened but remained significant after controlling relevant demographic surgical factors. found regional support need more clear guidelines related appropriateness criteria. have been their less severe might reflect cultural how on health state when answering PROMs. Clinicians should be aware these interpreting studies conducted different regions. Future investigate assess intraregional variation. Level III.

参考文章(49)
Nan M. Laird, James H. Ware, Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, Applied Longitudinal Analysis ,(2004)
Wiebe C Verra, Lennard G H van den Boom, Wilco C H Jacobs, Jan W Schoones, Ate B Wymenga, Rob G H H Nelissen, Similar outcome after retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica. ,vol. 86, pp. 195- 201 ,(2015) , 10.3109/17453674.2014.973329
J. H. Kellgren, J. S. Lawrence, Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. ,vol. 16, pp. 494- 502 ,(1957) , 10.1136/ARD.16.4.494
JOHN CHARNLEY, DAVID K. HALLEY, Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 112, pp. 170- 179 ,(1975) , 10.1097/00003086-197510000-00021
Kazuya Sugitani, Yuji Arai, Hisatake Takamiya, Ryu Terauchi, Shuji Nakagawa, Keiichiro Ueshima, Toshikazu Kubo, Factors affecting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty in patients with more than 120 degrees of preoperative flexion angle. International Orthopaedics. ,vol. 39, pp. 1535- 1540 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S00264-015-2710-1
In Jun Koh, Tae Kyun Kim, Chong Bum Chang, Hyung Joon Cho, Yong In, Trends in Use of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Korea From 2001 to 2010 Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 471, pp. 1441- 1450 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11999-012-2622-Y
Kirill Gromov, Meridith E Greene, Nanna H Sillesen, Anders Troelsen, Henrik Malchau, James I Huddleston, Roger Emerson, Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo, Peter Gebuhr, None, Regional Differences Between US and Europe in Radiological Osteoarthritis and Self Assessed Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 29, pp. 2078- 2083 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ARTH.2014.07.006
Jong Keun Seon, Ju Kwon Park, Mun Su Jeong, Woo Bin Jung, Kyung Soon Park, Taek Rim Yoon, Eun Kyoo Song, Correlation between preoperative and postoperative knee kinematics in total knee arthroplasty using cruciate retaining designs International Orthopaedics. ,vol. 35, pp. 515- 520 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S00264-010-1029-1
Michael Dunbar, Otto Robertsson, Leif Ryd, What's all that noise? The effect of co-morbidity on health outcome questionnaire results after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. ,vol. 75, pp. 119- 126 ,(2004) , 10.1080/00016470412331294355
Antonio Escobar, José M. Quintana, Amaia Bilbao, Berta Ibañez, Juan C. Arenaza, Luis Gutiérrez, Jesús Azkárate, Jose I. Güenaga, Ignacio Vidaurreta, Development of explicit criteria for prioritization of hip and knee replacement. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. ,vol. 13, pp. 429- 434 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2006.00733.X