The unmet potential of interdisciplinary research: Political psychological approaches to voting and public opinion

作者: James N. Druckman , James H. Kuklinski , Lee Sigelman

DOI: 10.1007/S11109-009-9092-2

关键词:

摘要: Since its founding, political science has embraced interdisciplinary research. Yet there exist few, if any, systematic assessments of the success these endeavors. We assess what is often seen as a paradigm collaboration: psychological research on voting and public opinion. Surprisingly, we find little evidence true work; instead, uncover misused concepts scant conceptual or disciplinary integration. conclude with suggestions for how to improve opinion, more generally.

参考文章(130)
John W. Payne, James R. Bettman, Eric J. Johnson, The adaptive decision maker: Frontmatter ,(1993) , 10.1017/CBO9781139173933
Penny S. Visser, George Y. Bizer, Jon A. Krosnick, Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength‐related Attitude Attributes Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 38, pp. 1- 67 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38001-X
Edward Tory Higgins, Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. Guilford Press. ,(1996)
Paul Oppenheim, Hilary Putnam, Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 2, ,(1958)
Milton Lodge, Charles S. Taber, The Rationalizing Voter: Unconscious Thought in Political Information Processing SSRN Electronic Journal. ,(2007) , 10.2139/SSRN.1077972
James H. Kuklinski, John A. Ferejohn, Information and democratic processes University of Illinois Press. ,(1990)
John W. Achee, Leonard L. Martin, Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,(1992)
Philip E. Converse, The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics Psychology Press. pp. 181- 199 ,(2004) , 10.4324/9780203505984-10