Optimisation of locking plate fixation methods for periprosthetic fractures

作者: Jonathan Mak

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) of the Femur is a common complication hip arthroplasty. With increasing rates total replacements, occurrence periprosthetic fractures expected to rise. These are often challenging treat effectively due technical challenges presented with combination fractured bone and an unstable prosthesis. Failure locking plate fixation around tip stable prosthesis (Vancouver type B1) have been reported clinically, suggesting that further investigation into their treatment needed. This study developed computational model, using experimentally tested specimens validate model. Clear relationships could be identified between experimental results for Intact Femur, replacement (THR) PPF cases. The model predict magnitude strain in hence likelihood fracture, as well assessing relative stiffness different scenarios. was suitable identification prediction changes set comparative cases used comment on biomechanical performances. The angle shown significant effect stabilised construct mechanics specifically, direction has very large stabilisation. Fractures ML were less than LM direction. 45° Medial Lateral case least stabile instrumentation configuration this clearly not optimal case. It recommended orientation should taken account by surgeons when deciding B1 management.

参考文章(82)
B A Masri, C P Duncan, Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 44, pp. 293- 304 ,(1995)
Eleftherios Tsiridis, George Pavlou, Ram Venkatesh, Peter Bobak, Graham Gie, Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management. Hip International. ,vol. 19, pp. 75- 86 ,(2009) , 10.1177/112070000901900201
Itiravivong P, Techapongvarachai T, Brohmwitak C, Kuptniratsaikul S, Plate-screw-wiring technique for the treatment of periprosthetic fracture around the hip: a biomechanical study. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet. ,(2001)
B. Barden, M. von Knoch, J. G. Fitzek, F. Löer, Periprosthetic fractures with extensive bone loss treated with onlay strut allografts International Orthopaedics. ,vol. 27, pp. 164- 167 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00264-002-0423-8
BRYAN D. SPRINGER, DANIEL J. BERRY, DAVID G. LEWALLEN, Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 85, pp. 2156- 2162 ,(2003) , 10.2106/00004623-200311000-00015
Daniel J. Berry, W. Scott Harmsen, Miguel E. Cabanela, Bernard F. Morrey, Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 84, pp. 171- 177 ,(2002) , 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002
Lutz E. Claes, Christa A. Heigele, Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke, Daniela Kaspar, Walter Seidl, Kristen J. Margevicius, Peter Augat, Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 355, pp. 132- 147 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00015
Eleftherios Tsiridis, Fares S. Haddad, Graham A. Gie, The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured. ,vol. 34, pp. 95- 105 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00257-7
Michael G. Dennis, Jordan A. Simon, Frederick J. Kummer, Kenneth J. Koval, Paul E. Di Cesare, Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. ,vol. 15, pp. 177- 180 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00005131-200103000-00005