Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.

作者: BRYAN D. SPRINGER , DANIEL J. BERRY , DAVID G. LEWALLEN

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200311000-00015

关键词: Femoral fractureFemurNonunionSurgeryImplantMedicineProsthesisVancouver classificationDentistryArthroplastyPeriprosthetic

摘要: Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty is indicated for most periprosthetic fractures that occur around the stem of femoral implant. The purpose present study was to assess results and complications revision treatment fractures. Methods: We evaluated 118 hips in 116 patients who underwent because an acute Vancouver type-B fracture. implant used a cemented forty-two hips, proximally porous-coated uncemented twenty-eight, extensively thirty, allograft-prosthesis composite or tumor prosthesis eighteen. mean duration follow-up 5.4 years. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated probability survival 90% at five years 79.2% ten with removal any reason as end point. Sixteen components were rerevised: rerevised loosening; three, loosening association fracture nonunion; two, recurrent dislocation; one, new Additionally, six implants resected deep infection (five) prosthetic (one). Radiographs ninety-six surviving showed twenty-one had evidence implant, four nonunion fracture, two both implant. Conclusions: successfully restored function patients. greatest long-term problems nonunion. Better seen when uncemented, used. Level Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, historical, control group]). See Instructions Authors complete description levels evidence.

参考文章(35)
B A Masri, C P Duncan, Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 44, pp. 293- 304 ,(1995)
Daniel J. Berry, Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 30, pp. 183- 190 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70073-0
Fiechter T, Magerl F, Blatter G, [Peri-prosthesis fractures in total hip endoprostheses]. Orthopade. ,vol. 18, pp. 545- 551 ,(1989)
Stephen J. Incavo, J. Wiedel, F. Pupparo, D. M. Beard, M. Ries, One-stage revision of periprosthetic fractures around loose cemented total hip arthroplasty. American journal of orthopedics. ,vol. 27, pp. 35- 41 ,(1998)
JOHN R. CROCKARELL, DANIEL J. BERRY, DAVID G. LEWALLEN, Nonunion after periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 81, pp. 1073- 1079 ,(1999) , 10.2106/00004623-199908000-00003
D S Garbuz, B A Masri, F S Haddad, C P Duncan, Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 49, pp. 83- 96 ,(2000)
J E Johansson, R McBroom, T W Barrington, G A Hunter, Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 63, pp. 1435- 1442 ,(1981) , 10.2106/00004623-198163090-00009
Michael G. Dennis, Jordan A. Simon, Frederick J. Kummer, Kenneth J. Koval, Paul E. Di Cesare, Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. ,vol. 15, pp. 177- 180 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00005131-200103000-00005
B. D. Mulliken, C. H. Rorabeck, R. B. Bourne, Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 325, pp. 156- 162 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00017
Kurt Kolstad, Revision THR after periprosthetic femoral fractures. An analysis of 23 cases. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. ,vol. 65, pp. 505- 508 ,(1994) , 10.3109/17453679409000900