How Do Teams in Quality Improvement Collaboratives Interact
作者： Jill A. Marsteller , Stephen M. Shortell , Michael Lin , Peter Mendel , Elizabeth Dell
DOI: 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33031-6
关键词:
摘要: Article-at-a-Glance Background The multi-organizational collaborative is a popular model for quality improvement (QI) initiatives. It assumes organizations will share information and social support. However, there no comprehensive documentation of the extent to which teams do interact. Considering QI collaboratives as networks, interactions among were documented, associations between network roles performance examined. Methods A telephone survey official team contact persons 94 site in three was conducted 2002 2003. Four measures used assess usefulness ties other being considered leader by peers. Results Eighty percent said they would another again if felt need. Teams made change direct result interaction 86% reported relationships. typically exchanged tools such software interacted outside planned activities. Having large number strongly related mentions leader. Both these variables are faculty-assessed performance, changes improve care, depth those changes. Discussion findings suggest that indeed exchange important information, dynamics contribute individual success.
jointcommissionjournal.com
elsevier.com参考文章(28)
Tim Wilson, Donald M. Berwick, Paul D. Cleary, What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experience from seven countries. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. ,vol. 29, pp. 85- 93 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1549-3741(03)29011-0
Donna M. Daniel, Jan Norman, Connie Davis, Helan Lee, Michael F. Hindmarsh, David K. McCulloch, Edward H. Wagner, Jonathan R. Sugarman, A State-Level Application of the Chronic Illness Breakthrough Series: Results from Two Collaboratives on Diabetes in Washington State The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. ,vol. 30, pp. 69- 79 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30008-0
Peter D. Mills, William B. Weeks, Characteristics of Successful Quality Improvement Teams: Lessons from Five Collaborative Projects in the VHA The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. ,vol. 30, pp. 152- 162 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S1549-3741(04)30017-1
Julia Neily, Kierston Howard, Patricia Quigley, Peter D. Mills, One-Year Follow-Up After a Collaborative Breakthrough Series on Reducing Falls and Fall-Related Injuries The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. ,vol. 31, pp. 275- 285 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31035-X
William B. Weeks, Peter D. Mills, Robert S. Dittus, David C. Aron, Paul B. Batalden, Using an Improvement Model to Reduce Adverse Drug Events in VA Facilities The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. ,vol. 27, pp. 243- 254 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27021-7
Jeremy M Grimshaw, Martin P Eccles, Jenny Greener, Graeme Maclennan, Tracy Ibbotson, James P Kahan, Frank Sullivan, Is the involvement of opinion leaders in the implementation of research findings a feasible strategy Implementation Science. ,vol. 1, pp. 3- 3 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1748-5908-1-3
Klea D. Bertakis, Edward J. Callahan, L. Jay Helms, Rahman Azari, John A. Robbins, Jill Miller, Physician practice styles and patient outcomes: differences between family practice and general internal medicine. Medical Care. ,vol. 36, pp. 879- 891 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00011
Rita Mangione-Smith, Matthias Schonlau, Kitty S. Chan, Joan Keesey, Mayde Rosen, Thomas A. Louis, Emmett Keeler, Measuring the Effectiveness of a Collaborative for Quality Improvement in Pediatric Asthma Care: Does Implementing the Chronic Care Model Improve Processes and Outcomes of Care? Ambulatory Pediatrics. ,vol. 5, pp. 75- 82 ,(2005) , 10.1367/A04-106R.1
Free Press, Macmillan Company, Everett Mitchell Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations ,(1962)
Stephen M. Shortell, Charles L. Bennett, Gayle R. Byck, Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Quarterly. ,vol. 76, pp. 593- 624 ,(1998) , 10.1111/1468-0009.00107