Networks of reader and country status: an analysis of Mendeley reader statistics

作者: Robin Haunschild , Lutz Bornmann , Loet Leydesdorff

DOI: 10.7717/PEERJ-CS.32

关键词:

摘要: The number of papers published in journals indexed by the Web Science core collection is steadily increasing. In recent years, nearly two million new were each year; somewhat more than one when primary research are considered only (articles and reviews document types where usually reported or reviewed). However, who reads these papers? More precisely, which groups researchers from (self-assigned) scientific disciplines countries reading Is it possible to visualize readership patterns for certain countries, disciplines, academic status groups? One popular method answer questions a network analysis. this study, we analyze Mendeley data set 1,133,224 articles 64,960 with publication year 2012 generate three different networks: (1) based on disciplinary affiliations readers contains four groups: (i) biology, (ii) social sciences humanities (including relevant computer sciences), (iii) bio-medical sciences, (iv) natural engineering. all groups, category addition "miscellaneous" prevails. (2) co-readers terms professional shows that common interest mainly shared among PhD students, Master’s postdocs. (3) country focusses global patterns: group 53 nations identified as enterprise, including Russia China well thirds OECD (Organisation Economic Co-operation Development) countries.

参考文章(28)
Staša Milojević, Network Analysis and Indicators Springer International Publishing. pp. 57- 82 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_3
Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Visualizing Bibliometric Networks Springer International Publishing. pp. 285- 320 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley Journal of Informetrics. ,vol. 9, pp. 477- 487 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JOI.2015.04.001
Wouter de Nooy, Andrej Mrvar, Vladimir Batagelj, Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek Cambridge University Press. ,(2011) , 10.1017/CBO9780511996368
Ehsan Mohammadi, Mike Thelwall, Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 65, pp. 1627- 1638 ,(2014) , 10.1002/ASI.23071
Loet Leydesdorff, Gaston Heimeriks, Daniele Rotolo, Journal portfolio analysis for countries, cities, and organizations: Maps and comparisons association for information science and technology. ,vol. 67, pp. 741- 748 ,(2016) , 10.1002/ASI.23551
William Gunn, Mendeley: Enabling and understanding scientific collaboration Information services & use. ,vol. 34, pp. 99- 102 ,(2014) , 10.3233/ISU-140738
Pardeep Sud, Mike Thelwall, Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration association for information science and technology. ,vol. 67, pp. 1849- 1857 ,(2016) , 10.1002/ASI.23515