摘要: In the 1980s and early 1990s, normativity of meaning was thought to be more-or-less 'incontestable.' But in last 25 years, many philosophers mind language have contested it several seemingly different ways. This, however, is somewhat illusory. There an unappreciated commonality among most anti-normativist arguments, this commonality, I argue, poses a problem for anti-normativism. The result, not wholesale rejection Rather, insight from position can harnessed reveal debate.
philpapers.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(20)
Kathrin Glüer, Peter Pagin, Rules of Meaning and Practical Reasoning Synthese. ,vol. 117, pp. 207- 227 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1005162503125
K. Gluer, A. Wikforss, Against Content Normativity Mind. ,vol. 118, pp. 31- 70 ,(2009) , 10.1093/MIND/FZN154
DANIEL WHITING, IS MEANING FRAUGHT WITH OUGHT Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. ,vol. 90, pp. 535- 555 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1468-0114.2009.01354.X
Adrian Haddock, II—Adrian Haddock: Meaning, Justification, and‘Primitive Normativity’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 86, pp. 147- 174 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2012.00212.X
Simon Blackburn, The Individual Strikes Back Synthese. ,vol. 58, pp. 281- 301 ,(1984) , 10.1007/BF00485244
PAUL A. BOGHOSSIAN, The rule-following considerations Mind. ,vol. 98, pp. 507- 549 ,(1989) , 10.1093/MIND/XCVIII.392.507
Wilfrid Sellars, Some Reflections on Language Games Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 21, pp. 204- 228 ,(1954) , 10.1086/287344
David Papineau, I–David Papineau Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 73, pp. 17- 43 ,(1999) , 10.1111/1467-8349.00047
GIDEON ROSEN, Brandom on Modality, Normativity and Intentionality Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. ,vol. 63, pp. 611- 623 ,(2001) , 10.1111/J.1933-1592.2001.TB00128.X
Hannah Ginsborg, I—Hannah Ginsborg: Meaning, Understanding and Normativity Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 86, pp. 127- 146 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2012.00211.X