II—Adrian Haddock: Meaning, Justification, and‘Primitive Normativity’

作者: Adrian Haddock

DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2012.00212.X

关键词:

摘要: I critically discuss two claims which Hannah Ginsborg makes on behalf of her account meaning in terms ‘primitive normativity’(2011; 2012): first, that it avoids the sceptical regress articulated by Kripke's Wittgenstein; second, sense thought—central to Wittgenstein—that ‘meaning is normative’, a way shows this thought not only be immune from recent criticisms but also undermine reductively naturalistic theories content. In course discussion, consider and attempt shed light number issues: structure regress; content its force against reductive theories; connection between justification; notion normativity’.

参考文章(19)
Hannah Ginsborg, , Primitive Normativity and Skepticism about Rules Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 108, pp. 227- 254 ,(2011) , 10.5840/JPHIL2011108518
José L. Zalabardo, Kripke's Normativity Argument Canadian Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 27, pp. 467- 488 ,(1997) , 10.1080/00455091.1997.10717482
Ruth Garrett Millikan, Truth, rules, hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox The Philosophical Review. ,vol. 99, pp. 323- 353 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2185347
Matthew Boyle, Transparent self-knowledge Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. ,(2011)
K. Gluer, A. Wikforss, Against Content Normativity Mind. ,vol. 118, pp. 31- 70 ,(2009) , 10.1093/MIND/FZN154
DANIEL WHITING, IS MEANING FRAUGHT WITH OUGHT Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. ,vol. 90, pp. 535- 555 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1468-0114.2009.01354.X
Matthew Boyle, II—Matthew Boyle: Transparent Self-Knowledge Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 85, pp. 223- 241 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2011.00204.X
Simon Blackburn, The Individual Strikes Back Synthese. ,vol. 58, pp. 281- 301 ,(1984) , 10.1007/BF00485244
Paul A. Boghossian, The normativity of content Philosophical Issues. ,vol. 13, pp. 31- 45 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1533-6077.00003