作者: Adrian Haddock
DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2012.00212.X
关键词:
摘要: I critically discuss two claims which Hannah Ginsborg makes on behalf of her account meaning in terms ‘primitive normativity’(2011; 2012): first, that it avoids the sceptical regress articulated by Kripke's Wittgenstein; second, sense thought—central to Wittgenstein—that ‘meaning is normative’, a way shows this thought not only be immune from recent criticisms but also undermine reductively naturalistic theories content. In course discussion, consider and attempt shed light number issues: structure regress; content its force against reductive theories; connection between justification; notion normativity’.