Behaving safely under pressure: The effects of job demands, resources, and safety climate on employee physical and psychosocial safety behavior

作者: Babette Bronkhorst

DOI: 10.1016/J.JSR.2015.09.002

关键词:

摘要: INTRODUCTION: Previous research has shown that employees who experience high job demands are more inclined to show unsafe behaviors in the workplace. In this paper, we examine why some behave safely when faced with these while others do not. We add literature by incorporating both physical and psychosocial safety climate resources (JD-R) model extending it include variants of behavior. METHOD: Using a sample 6230 health care nested within 52 organizations, examined relationship between (a) resources, (b) climate, (c) conducted multilevel analyses test our hypotheses. RESULTS: Job (i.e., work pressure), autonomy, supervisor support, co-worker support) (both climate) directly associated with, respectively, lower higher also found evidence buffers negative impact work-family conflict insecurity) on behavior strengthens positive CONCLUSIONS: Regardless whether focus is or psychological safety, results strengthening an organization can increase employees' Practical implication: An organization's optimal target intervention prevent ameliorate outcomes, especially times uncertainty change. Language: en

参考文章(49)
Paul E. Spector, A Consideration of the Validity and Meaning of Self-Report Measures of Job Conditions International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology West Sussex, England: John Wiley. ,vol. 7, pp. 123- ,(1992)
Maureen F. Dollard, Robert A. Karasek, Building Psychosocial Safety Climate Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice, Volume 1. pp. 208- 233 ,(2010) , 10.1002/9780470661550.CH11
Dov Zohar, Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. American Psychological Association. ,(2011) , 10.1037/10474-006
Feng Li, Li Jiang, Xiang Yao, YongJuan Li, Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: The roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 51, pp. 243- 251 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.AAP.2012.11.029
Maureen F. Dollard, Michelle R. Tuckey, Christian Dormann, Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand–resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 45, pp. 694- 704 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AAP.2011.09.042
Barbara A. Mark, Linda C. Hughes, Michael Belyea, Yunkyung Chang, David Hofmann, Cheryl B. Jones, Cynthia T. Bacon, Does safety climate moderate the influence of staffing adequacy and work conditions on nurse injuries Journal of Safety Research. ,vol. 38, pp. 431- 446 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JSR.2007.04.004
Charles E. Lance, Marcus M. Butts, Lawrence C. Michels, The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria What Did They Really Say Organizational Research Methods. ,vol. 9, pp. 202- 220 ,(2006) , 10.1177/1094428105284919
Michael S. Christian, Jill C. Bradley, J. Craig Wallace, Michael J. Burke, Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 94, pp. 1103- 1127 ,(2009) , 10.1037/A0016172
Garry B. Hall, Maureen F. Dollard, Jane Coward, Psychosocial safety climate: Development of the PSC-12. International Journal of Stress Management. ,vol. 17, pp. 353- 383 ,(2010) , 10.1037/A0021320
Arnold B. Bakker, Evangelia Demerouti, The job demands-resources model : state of the art Journal of Managerial Psychology. ,vol. 22, pp. 309- 328 ,(2007) , 10.1108/02683940710733115