Habitat loss, fragmentation and predator impact: spatial implications for prey conservation

作者: Michael F. Schneider

DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2664.2001.00642.X

关键词:

摘要: Summary 1 Because predators threaten the survival of endangered prey in many places, predator management is a widespread conservation tool. At same time, effects on their are greatly influenced by landscape structure. Therefore, landscapes could be an alternative to regulation. 2 A spatially explicit presence/absence model (a stochastic one-layer cellular automaton) was used investigate two different predator–prey systems that were subject changes number and size habitat patches landscape. 3 The first scenario included grey-sided voles Clethrionomysrufocanus, Norwegian lemmings Lemmus lemmus small mustelids (stoats Mustelaerminea weasels M. nivalis) interacting tundra landscape. In second scenario, effect perforation human settlements with subsidized (house cats Felis silvestris catus) dynamics (as surrogate for prey) studied. 4 Both total area lemming degree fragmentation important determinants population persistence lemmings. A qualitative change observed when decreased from 70% (positive effect) 50% (negative effect). When covered or less landscape, had negative viability, even though did not decrease. 5 The spatial configuration as sources important. few evenly spaced populations than proportion randomly distributed, which turn patches. 6 Including decrease predators’ impact occurred patches. 7 It concluded viable strategy combat threat prey, but careful planning pattern compensate predation effects. The location should optimized order minimize visiting adjacent areas natural habitat.

参考文章(68)
R.M. Sibly, Strategies of digestion and defecation Physiological ecology ; an evolutionary approach to resource use. ,(1981)
Ilkka Hanski, Effects of landscape pattern on competitive interactions Springer Netherlands. pp. 203- 224 ,(1995) , 10.1007/978-94-011-0717-4_9
Peter Kareiva, David Skelly, Mary Ruckelshaus, Reevaluating the Use of Models to Predict the Consequences of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation The Ecological Basis of Conservation. pp. 156- 166 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-6003-6_16
Susan Harrison, Lenore Fahrig, Landscape pattern and population conservation Hansson, L, Fahrig, L, Merriam, G I A L E Studies in Landscape Ecology, Vol. pp. 293- 308 ,(1995) , 10.1007/978-94-011-0717-4_12
Lauri Oksanen, Maano Aunapuu, Tarja Oksanen, Michael Schneider, Per Ekerholm, Peter A Lundberg, Toomas Armulik, Villem Aruoja, Lena Bondestad, None, Outlines of food webs in a low arctic tundra landscape in relation to three theories on trophic dynamics pp. 351- 373 ,(1997)
Krister Brood, Mänsklig ohyra och Sydgeorgiens piplärkor Fauna och Flora. pp. 16- 18 ,(1996)
Eli Meir, Peter M. Kareiva, Contributions of Spatially Explicit Landscape Models To Conservation Biology Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 497- 507 ,(1998) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-6051-7_22
Kevin R. Crooks, Michael E. Soulé, Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system Nature. ,vol. 400, pp. 563- 566 ,(1999) , 10.1038/23028