Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters
作者： Marinke Westerterp , Jan Pruim , Wim Oyen , Otto Hoekstra , Anne Paans
DOI: 10.1007/S00259-006-0224-1
关键词:
摘要: Purpose Standardised uptake values (SUVs) depend on acquisition, reconstruction and region of interest (ROI) parameters. SUV quantification in multi-centre trials therefore requires standardisation acquisition analysis protocols. However, is difficult owing to the use different scanners, image data software. In this study we evaluated whether SUVs, obtained at three institutes, may be directly compared after calibration correction for inter-institute differences.
springer.com
ru.nl
vumc.nl
sci-hub.se 参考文章(26)
D. Visvikis, C. Cheze-LeRest, D. Costa, J. Bomanji, S. Gacinovic, P. Ell, Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardised uptake values for [18F]FDG PET. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 28, pp. 1326- 1335 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S002590100566
Velimir Ivančević, Roland Bares, Dieter L. Munz, Bernd O. Knoop, Maike de Wit, Lilli Geworski, Multicenter Comparison of Calibration and Cross Calibration of PET Scanners The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 43, pp. 635- 639 ,(2002)
Ronald Boellaard, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Otto S. Hoekstra, Nanda C. Krak, Effects of Noise, Image Resolution, and ROI Definition on the Accuracy of Standard Uptake Values: A Simulation Study The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 45, pp. 1519- 1527 ,(2004)
Sibylle I. Ziegler, Markus Schwaiger, Axel-R. Hanauske, Wolfgang A. Weber, Ralf Thödtmann, Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 40, pp. 1771- 1777 ,(1999)
Farrokh Dehdashti, Heinrich R. Schelbert, Richard L. Wahl, Henry D. Royal, Carl K. Hoh, Manuel Brown, Magnus N. Dahlbom, Procedure Guideline for Tumor Imaging Using Fluorine-18-FDG The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 39, pp. 1302- 1305 ,(1998)
Klaus Wienhard, Lars Eriksson, Sylke Grootoonk, Mike Casey, Uwe Pietrzyk, Wolf-Dieter Heiss, Performance evaluation of the positron scanner ECAT EXACT. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 16, pp. 804- 813 ,(1992) , 10.1097/00004728-199209000-00024
Nanda C. Krak, R. Boellaard, Otto S. Hoekstra, Jos W. R. Twisk, Corneline J. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 32, pp. 294- 301 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S00259-004-1566-1
K. Scheidhauer, C. Walter, M. D. Seemann, FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 31, ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00259-004-1528-7
Nanda C. Krak, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Otto S. Hoekstra, Measuring Response to Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Methodological Considerations European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 31, pp. 169- 180 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00259-004-1532-Y
Norbert E. Avril, Wolfgang A. Weber, Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET Radiologic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 43, pp. 189- 204 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.RCL.2004.09.006