Resolving Conflicting Information

作者: John Cantwell

DOI: 10.1023/A:1008296216319

关键词:

摘要: Information received from different sources can be inconsistent. Even when the of information ordered on basis their trustworthiness, it turns out that extracting an acceptable notion support for is a non-trivial matter, as question what rational agent should accept. Here shown how ordering generated and used to decide accept not This ordering, out, closely related notions such Epistemic Entrenchment Grove spheres studied in belief revision.

参考文章(24)
Salem Benferhat, Claudette Cayrol, Henri Prade, Jerome Lang, Didier Dubois, Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 640- 645 ,(1993)
Robert Demolombe, Laurence Cholvy, Reasoning with information sources ordered by topics artificial intelligence methodology systems applications. pp. 151- 162 ,(1995)
Mary-Anne Williams, Iterated theory base change: a computational model international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 1541- 1547 ,(1995)
Wlodzimierz Rabinowicz, Stable Revision, or Is Preservation Worth Preserving? Logic, Action, and Information. pp. 101- 128 ,(1996)
Sven Ove Hansson, Taking Belief Bases Seriously Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 13- 28 ,(1994) , 10.1007/978-94-015-8311-4_2
Peter Gärdenfors, David Makinson, Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. pp. 83- 95 ,(1988)
Keith Lehrer, Theory of knowledge ,(1990)
Hans Rott, Coherent Choice and Epistemic Entrechment (Preliminary Report) KI '94 Proceedings of the 18th Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. pp. 284- 295 ,(1994) , 10.1007/3-540-58467-6_25
Mukesh Dalal, Investigations into a Theory of Knowledge Base Revision. national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 475- 479 ,(1988)