Visual field assessment and the Austroads driving standard.

摘要: Purpose: To compare the conventional (Humphrey 24-2) automated visual field testing with Goldmann standard test for driving, and to predict how many patients glaucoma may not meet Australian driving respect fields. Methods: Four (retinitis pigmentosa, or vigabatrin treatment) marked defects as determined by uniocular static computerized perimetry (conventional testing) were re-evaluated binocular kinetic IV4e target (Australian standard). A series of 48 consecutive seen Glaucoma Inheritance Study in Tasmania assessed both test. Results: The four severe (on perimetry) found on test. On perimetry, 15 from have sufficient severity that they standard. However, only five these failed fields, two whom still driving. Conclusions: Patients driving. Approximately 30% would loss shown Humphrey 24-2 a requires further determine if Ten per cent tested did fields.