Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

摘要: Abstract As the international community increases investment in agricultural adaptation to climate change low and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is increasing demand extract generalized knowledge claims about vulnerability from individual studies. If synthesis successfully produce sound claims, relevant evidence must be possible find interpret. The format through which research this field now normally reported does not adequately support finding nor its interpretation. This opinion piece outlines assesses three pathways for changing reporting practices – standardization of methods, checklists, modularised order identification evidence. Rather than resolving these issues, intends open up conversation them.