Comparison of the ProCyte Dx analyzer with the ADVIA 2120 and the manual differential for validation of equine and bovine hemograms

作者: Fee Goldmann , Natali Bauer , Andreas Moritz

DOI: 10.1007/S00580-012-1489-3

关键词:

摘要: The aim of this study was to evaluate the laser-based in-house hematology analyzer ProCyte Dx performing a complete hemogram for bovine and equine blood samples. This is prospective clinically healthy or ill horses (n = 175) cattle (n = 115). EDTA-anticoagulated samples were analyzed within 3–6 h after sampling. Routine variables including differential counts compared reference methods (ADVIA 2120, 200-cell manual leukocyte count). Statistical analysis performed twice, i.e., prior exclusion specimens with graphical reports (dot plots) indicative invalid separation cellular populations. Coefficient variation <3 % (CBC) <7 % (differential count) except eosinophils monocytes (cattle) platelets (PLTs) (horse). Linearity excellent platelets. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (r s) revealed good s = 0.99–0.80) between both analyzers majority mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) s = 0.33–0.65), assessed impedance count s = 0.79), (both species). Biases close 0; however, MCHC, (HGB), PLTs large biases seen species. There favorable variables. HGB HGB-derived caused by methodology ADVIA. As other analyzers, correct PLT monocyte are difficult. Dot plot useful tool detect populations thus necessity perform count.

参考文章(16)
Pamela B. Bollinger, Benjamin Drewinko, Carrie D. Brailas, Nancy A. Smeeton, Jose M. Trujillo, The Technicon H*1™—An Automated Hematology Analyzer for Today and Tomorrow: Complete Blood Count Parameters American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 87, pp. 71- 78 ,(1987) , 10.1093/AJCP/87.1.71
Paul Watson, Aviva Petrie, Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science ,(1999)
Marjory B Brooks, Kendal E Harr, Davis M Seelig, K Jane Wardrop, Douglas J Weiss, None, Schalm's Veterinary Hematology ,(1986)
Inger Lilliehöök, Harold Tvedten, Validation of the Sysmex XT‐2000iV hematology system for dogs, cats, and horses. II. Differential leukocyte counts Veterinary Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 38, pp. 175- 182 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1939-165X.2009.00126.X
Andreas Moritz, Yvonne Fickenscher, Karin Meyer, Klaus Failing, Douglas J. Weiss, Canine and feline hematology reference values for the ADVIA 120 hematology system Veterinary Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 33, pp. 32- 38 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1939-165X.2004.TB00347.X
Natali Bauer, Julia Nakagawa, Cathrin Dunker, Klaus Failing, Andreas Moritz, Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV™ compared to the ADVIA® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses: Part I--precision, linearity, and accuracy of complete blood cell count. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. ,vol. 23, pp. 1168- 1180 ,(2011) , 10.1177/1040638711425572
J.M. England, R.M. Rowan, O.W. Assendelft, B.S. Bull, W.H. Coulter, K. Fujimoto, W. Groner, A.R. Jones, J.A. Koepke, S.M. Lewis, N.K. Shinton, N. Tatsumi, R. Thom, R.L. Verwilghen, C.E. McLaren, Guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications Clinical and Laboratory Haematology. ,vol. 16, pp. 157- 174 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2257.1994.TB00402.X