Effects of Group Apology and Reparation after Breach of Psychological Contract

作者: Anthony Alongi

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Psychological contracts are expectations of reciprocal obligations between an employee and organization which held by the employee. Research has shown that victims who experience psychological contract breach may seek to retaliate towards offending organization. Little research investigated how a can be remediated. The present study effects group apology reparation on victim‟s sense power revenge cognition after contract. Participants were asked imagine themselves in vignette student experiences their academic department. outcome scenario differed according condition they assigned: received no response from department, reparations, apology, or with reparations. All participants then completed same series measures, including power, cognitions, likelihood transmit negative rumor, calculus-based trust, identification-based trust. Results showed reparations elicited greater less victim compared not receiving response. Receiving did increase decrease cognition. Additionally, effect is mediated Implications for these results suggest if breaches wishes repair relationship victim, should focus offering adequate as helpful diffusing retaliation.

参考文章(35)
Mclean Parks J, D. Rousseau, The contracts of individuals and organizations ,(1993)
Graeme Hutcheson, The Multivariate Social Scientist SAGE Publications, Ltd.. ,(1999) , 10.4135/9780857028075
Piotr Olaf Zylicz, Samuel P. Oliner, Altruism, Intergroup Apology, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation ,(2008)
Andy Field, Jeremy Miles, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS ,(2000)
Peter H. Kim, Donald L. Ferrin, Cecily D. Cooper, Kurt T. Dirks, Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence- Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 89, pp. 104- 118 ,(2004) , 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
Roy J. Lewicki, Maura A. Stevenson, , Trust Development in Negotiation: Proposed Actions and a Research Agenda Business and Professional Ethics Journal. ,vol. 16, pp. 99- 132 ,(1997) , 10.5840/BPEJ1997161/2/311
Peter H. Kim, Kurt T. Dirks, Cecily D. Cooper, Donald L. Ferrin, When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 99, pp. 49- 65 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.OBHDP.2005.07.002
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Matthew J. Hornsey, Prashant Bordia, Sarah R. Esposo, Effects of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Insights from the Group Value Model Journal of Management Studies. ,vol. 45, pp. 1377- 1400 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1467-6486.2008.00792.X