Sampling completeness in seed dispersal networks: When enough is enough

作者: José M. Costa , Luís P. da Silva , Jaime A. Ramos , Ruben H. Heleno

DOI: 10.1016/J.BAAE.2015.09.008

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Ecological networks are an increasingly popular tool to explore community assembly rules and frame practical conservation issues. However, most described vary largely in sampling effort, hampering the distinction of true biological patterns from artefacts caused by poor sampling. Identifying entire seeds droppings mist-netted birds is generally considered a preferred method for building unbiased, quantitative seed dispersal networks. We retrieved 936 captured during five days seven sites Portugal estimated completeness as diversity species, disperser links detected with respect those predicted Chao 2 estimator. In one sites, effort was extended 25 evaluate sensitivity ten network structure descriptors increasing effort. After we 93% 97% 79% 2, however resulted detection more seeds, dispersers, than at day 5. Most only began stabilize around 8, except Connectance Weighted that stabilized earlier. Similarly, after 8 significantly departed confidence interval null models exclusively constrained species abundances, thus reflecting independent ecological patterns. Nestedness exception, it never models. suggest may slightly underestimate real our case least eight were needed build sound 67% 88% 71% detected. Our results have important implications interpretation because under-sampled produce biased do not suitably characterize focal communities.

参考文章(52)
Nico Blüthgen, Florian Menzel, Nils Blüthgen, Measuring specialization in species interaction networks BMC Ecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 9- 9 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
RUBEN H. HELENO, GEORGINA ROSS, AMY EVERARD, JANE MEMMOTT, JAIME A. RAMOS, The role of avian 'seed predators' as seed dispersers Ibis. ,vol. 153, pp. 199- 203 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1474-919X.2010.01088.X
A. Chao, Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. ,vol. 11, pp. 265- 270 ,(1984)
Matthias Schleuning, Katrin Böhning-Gaese, D. Matthias Dehling, Kevin C. Burns, At a loss for birds: insularity increases asymmetry in seed-dispersal networks Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 23, pp. 385- 394 ,(2014) , 10.1111/GEB.12134
Natacha P. Chacoff, Diego P. Vázquez, Silvia B. Lomáscolo, Erica L. Stevani, Jimena Dorado, Benigno Padrón, Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant–pollinator network Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 81, pp. 190- 200 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2656.2011.01883.X
Carsten F. Dormann, Rouven Strauss, Detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks: the QuaBiMo algorithm arXiv: Quantitative Methods. ,(2013) , 10.1111/2041-210X.12139
Paulo R. Guimarães, Glauco Machado, Marcus A.M. de Aguiar, Pedro Jordano, Jordi Bascompte, Aluísio Pinheiro, Sérgio Furtado dos Reis, Build-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 249, pp. 181- 189 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JTBI.2007.08.004
Ruben Heleno, Mariano Devoto, Michael Pocock, Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value: Is it any good to be well connected? Ecological Indicators. ,vol. 14, pp. 7- 10 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2011.06.032
Stein Joar Hegland, Jennifer Dunne, Anders Nielsen, Jane Memmott, How to monitor ecological communities cost-efficiently: The example of plant–pollinator networks Biological Conservation. ,vol. 143, pp. 2092- 2101 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2010.05.018