Species traits and abundances predict metrics of plant-pollinator network structure, but not pairwise interactions

作者: Colin Olito , Jeremy W. Fox

DOI: 10.1111/OIK.01439

关键词:

摘要: Plant–pollinator mutualistic networks represent the ecological context of foraging (for pollinators) and reproduction plants some pollinators). visitation exhibit highly conserved structural properties across diverse habitats species assemblages. The most successful hypotheses to explain these network are neutrality biological constraints hypotheses, which posit that interaction frequencies can be explained by relative abundances, trait mismatches between potential mutualists respectively. However, previous analyses emphasize prediction metrics qualitative structure, may not stringent tests hypotheses. Using a newly documented temporally explicit alpine plant–pollinator network, we show both quantitative structure easy predict, even models predict identity or frequency interactions poorly. A variety phenological morphological as well neutral successfully predicted all tested, without accurately predicting observed interactions. Species phenology alone was best predictor frequencies. were poor predictors pairwise frequencies, suggesting other aspects biology generally considered in studies, such for dipterans, play an important role shaping at this site. Future progress explaining dynamics will require new approaches accurate rather than metrics, better reflect underlying

参考文章(51)
P. J. Cheek, P. McCullagh, J. A. Nelder, Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. Applied Statistics. ,vol. 39, pp. 385- 386 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2347392
Timothée Poisot, Elsa Canard, Nicolas Mouquet, Michael E. Hochberg, A comparative study of ecological specialization estimators Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 3, pp. 537- 544 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.2041-210X.2011.00174.X
Nico Blüthgen, Florian Menzel, Nils Blüthgen, Measuring specialization in species interaction networks BMC Ecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 9- 9 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
Pedro Jordano, Jens M. Olesen, Jordi Bascompte, The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. University of Chicago Press. ,(2006)
Timothée Poisot, James D. Bever, Adnane Nemri, Peter H. Thrall, Michael E. Hochberg, A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialisation. Ecology Letters. ,vol. 14, pp. 841- 851 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2011.01645.X
Stein Joar Hegland, Jennifer Dunne, Anders Nielsen, Jane Memmott, How to monitor ecological communities cost-efficiently: The example of plant–pollinator networks Biological Conservation. ,vol. 143, pp. 2092- 2101 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2010.05.018
Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni, Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama, Marlies Sazima, Processes entangling interactions in communities: forbidden links are more important than abundance in a hummingbird-plant network. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 281, pp. 20132397- 20132397 ,(2014) , 10.1098/RSPB.2013.2397
Nikolas M Waser, Lars Chittka, Mary V Price, Neal M Williams, Jeff Ollerton, None, Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters Ecology. ,vol. 77, pp. 1043- 1060 ,(1996) , 10.2307/2265575