Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of manipulation: Exploration of a multivariate model including spinal stiffness, multifidus recruitment, and clinical findings

作者: Julie M. Fritz , Shane L. Koppenhaver , Gregory N. Kawchuk , Deydre S. Teyhen , Jeffrey J. Hebert

DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0B013E318216337D

关键词:

摘要: Study Design.: Prospective case series. Objective.: To examine spinal stiffness in patients with low back pain (LBP) receiving manipulative therapy (SMT), evaluate associations between characteristics and clinical outcome, explore a multivariate model of SMT mechanisms as related to effects on stiffness, lumbar multifidus (LM) recruitment, status prediction rule (CPR) for outcomes. Summary Background Data.: Mechanisms underlying the are poorly understood. Many explanations have been proposed, but few studies potential outcomes or considered multiple concurrently. Methods.: Patients LBP were treated two sessions over 1 week. CPR was assessed at baseline. Clinical outcome based Oswestry disability index (ODI). Mechanized indentation measures ultrasonic LM recruitment taken before after each SMT, Global terminal calculated. Multivariate regression used relationship variables percentage ODI improvement. Zero-order correlations among variables, changes, status, examined. A path analysis effects. Results.: Forty-eight (54% women) had complete data. Significant immediate decreases global occurred post-SMT regardless outcome. improvement greater decrease (P = 0.025), less initial 0.01). supported suggesting that is mediated by improvements stiffness. Initial may relate though their recruitment. Conclusion.: The explaining benefits appear be multifactorial. Both changes play role.

参考文章(65)
Samuel R Ward, Choll W Kim, Carolyn M Eng, Lionel J Gottschalk, Akihito Tomiya, Steven R Garfin, Richard L Lieber, Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 91, pp. 176- 185 ,(2009) , 10.2106/JBJS.G.01311
John D. Childs, Julie M. Fritz, Timothy W. Flynn, James J. Irrgang, Kevin K. Johnson, Guy R. Majkowski, Anthony Delitto, A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 141, pp. 920- 928 ,(2004) , 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008
Paul W. Hodges, Mary P. Galea, Sten Holm, Allison Kaigle Holm, Corticomotor excitability of back muscles is affected by intervertebral disc lesion in pigs European Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 29, pp. 1490- 1500 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1460-9568.2009.06670.X
Joel E. Bialosky, Mark D. Bishop, Michael E. Robinson, Giorgio Zeppieri, Steven Z. George, Spinal Manipulative Therapy Has an Immediate Effect on Thermal Pain Sensitivity in People With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Physical Therapy. ,vol. 89, pp. 1292- 1303 ,(2009) , 10.2522/PTJ.20090058
Gert Bronfort, Mitchell Haas, Roni L. Evans, Lex M. Bouter, Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal. ,vol. 4, pp. 335- 356 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2003.06.002
J Latimer, R Adams, C M Moran, M Lee, An investigation of the relationship between low back pain and lumbar posteroanterior stiffness. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. ,vol. 19, pp. 587- 591 ,(1996)
Linda S. Fidell, Barbara G. Tabachnick, Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. ,(2007)
Debbie L. Horn, Vertebral Subluxation Complex ,(1993)