作者: J. Sánchez-Fernández , J. Bachiller-Burgos , Á. Serrano-Pascual , J.M. Cózar-Olmo , I. Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugués
DOI: 10.1016/J.ACUROE.2015.11.004
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Context and objective The acquisition improvement of surgical skills constitute a fundamental element in the training any practitioner. At present, however, assessment these is scarcely developed area research. aim this study was to analyze peculiarities various systems establish minimum criteria that knowledge system should meet as method for assessing urological surgery. Acquisition evidence Scientific literature review aimed at currently available competencies (technical nontechnical), with special focus on systematic reviews prospective studies. Summary After conducting review, we found competence have, our opinion, number shortcomings. There certain degree subjectivity surgeons by evaluators. nontechnical not formally recorded. no description follow-up or basic parameters associated healthcare quality. registration techniques. also ranking specific their application. Conclusions We believe development new nontechnical) urologists techniques necessary. To end, team has worked developing Evaluation System Surgical Competencies Laparoscopy, which based definition, demonstrated surgeons.