Hitting the high notes : Challenge in teaching honors students

作者: K. Scager

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Over the last two decades, honors programs and colleges have mushroomed throughout Netherlands elsewhere. Honors are intended to challenge most academically gifted students develop their full potential.The developed by inspired teachers who allowed freedom create innovative learning environments, resulting in a diversity of instructional strategies believed match needs high-ability students. However, much is still be understood about specific design education for these The main research aim guiding this thesis was examine appropriate at university level (honors students). examining based on assumption that differ from non-honors peers potential excellence, therefore need differentiated strategies. To test assumption, we first inquired differences between with respect characteristics expected vital excellence: intelligence, motivation creativity. By means questionnaire, non-honors) Utrecht University were assessed self-report questionnaire three characteristics. Results showed differed significantly terms combined variables as well separate variables, exception ‘persistence’. Since results students, it seemed justifiable assume distinct further qualities. next studies sought answers questions how Findings case study maximum effort (perceived) experienced when perceived exceeded ability most, during which felt worried frustrated. These indicate balance enjoyment, but not necessarily effort, persistence learning. This finding unexpected, given negative emotions been impede intrinsic As question what constituted challenge, found three-factor model challenge: autonomy, complexity, high teacher expectations. We investigated generalizability subsequent study, where examined six courses, varying discipline, questioning factors environment (lack of) highest levels (autonomy, expectations) occurred simultaneously, confirming mentioned above. Some courses multiple very challenging, suggested why similar settings made different choices they provided address question, interviewed 12 teachers, considerations regarding choice whether or revealed several dilemmas relating showing applying significant educational objective such straightforward. For example, maximizing supposed stimulate bring talents bloom. But same time, example emphasized might affect students’ feelings safety, subsequently scare away contributing class discussions.

参考文章(254)
Paul Mallery, Darren George, SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference Allyn & Bacon, A Viacom Company, 160 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02194-2130; Tel: 800-666-9433 (Toll Free); Web Site: http://www.abacon.com ($36).. ,(1998)
Robert J. Sternberg, Conceptions of Giftedness: The WICS Model of Giftedness Cambridge University Press. pp. 327- 342 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.019
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Adrian Furnham, Personality and Intellectual Competence ,(2005)
Larisa V. Shavinina, Innovation Education for the Gifted: A New Direction in Gifted Education Springer Netherlands. pp. 1257- 1267 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_65
Hans Gruber, Heinz Mandl, Instructional Psychology and the Gifted International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. pp. 383- 396 ,(2000) , 10.1016/B978-008043796-5/50027-9
Donald P. Kaczvinsky, What is an Honors Student? A Noel-Levitz Survey The Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council. ,vol. 8, pp. 87- ,(2007)
Reva Friedman-Nimz, Olha Skyba, Personality Qualities That Help or Hinder Gifted and Talented Individuals Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 421- 435 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_19
Joseph S. Renzulli, A Rising Tide Lifts All Ships: Developing the Gifts and Talents of All Students. Phi Delta Kappan. ,vol. 80, ,(1998)