The needs of nomadic-pastoral land users with respect to EIA theory, methods and effectiveness: What are they and does EIA address them?

作者: Bayarmaa Byambaa , Walter T. de Vries

DOI: 10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.10.004

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The aim of this article is to examine the needs nomadic-pastoral land users with respect EIA theory, methods and effectiveness based on literature review by applying Retief (2010)’s framework. intends identify these analyse whether addresses them sufficiently appropriately. framework defines (quality) as three main interrelated themes environmental assessment. Our was guided moreover, using nomadic pastoralism a test case, we attempted expand broad into four-step approach that can be used systematically literature. first adopts secondly, identifies issues use which matter most themes. next step selected 156 articles for considering identified previously fourth examined concept-centric content analysis. Nomadic-pastoral need theory incorporate irrational logic complex unpredictable socio-ecological features use. Decisions made rational decision-making model in cannot due uncertainties associated different power, values interests stakeholders pasture resources. Furthermore, are related impact pathways dynamic character address pathways. However, current primarily focus static use, do not appropriately nature For users, maintaining quality participation important EIA. empirical data needed addressed Nevertheless, frameworks evaluation sufficient assessment EIA's capacity addressing users. Further studies should at incorporating interaction dynamics theories developing suitable models herding mobility strategy prediction

参考文章(47)
Anastássios Perdicoúlis, John Glasson, Causal networks in EIA Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 26, pp. 553- 569 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2006.04.004
Roel Slootweg, Frank Vanclay, Marlies van Schooten, Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. ,vol. 19, pp. 19- 28 ,(2001) , 10.3152/147154601781767186
JOE WESTON, EIA THEORIES — ALL CHINESE WHISPERS AND NO CRITICAL THEORY Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. ,vol. 12, pp. 357- 374 ,(2010) , 10.1142/S1464333210003693
Chaunjit Chanchitpricha, Alan Bond, Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 43, pp. 65- 72 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2013.05.006
Thomas Koellner, Laura de Baan, Tabea Beck, Miguel Brandão, Barbara Civit, Manuele Margni, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Rosie Saad, Danielle Maia de Souza, Ruedi Müller-Wenk, UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 18, pp. 1188- 1202 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11367-013-0579-Z
Erwin Lindeijer, Review of land use impact methodologies Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 8, pp. 273- 281 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00024-X
Llorenç Milà i Canals, Christian Bauer, Jochen Depestele, Alain Dubreuil, Ruth Freiermuth Knuchel, Gérard Gaillard, Ottar Michelsen, Ruedi Müller-Wenk, Bernt Rydgren, Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp) The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 12, pp. 5- 15 ,(2007) , 10.1065/LCA2006.05.250
Kevin Hanna, Bram F. Noble, Using a Delphi study to identify effectiveness criteria for environmental assessment Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. ,vol. 33, pp. 116- 125 ,(2015) , 10.1080/14615517.2014.992672