Butterfly monitoring using systematically placed transects in contrasting climatic regions - Exploring an established spatial design for sampling

作者: Lars Pettersson , Elin Videvall , Erik Öckinger

DOI: 10.3897/NATURECONSERVATION.14.7497

关键词:

摘要: Butterfly monitoring schemes are recording programs initiated to monitor nationwide butterfly abundance and distribution patterns, often with help from volunteers. The method generates high-resolution data, but may be associated a degree of habitat sampling bias if volunteers prefer survey areas perceived high-quality habitats. This can result in habitats becoming underrepresented the data set, leading less information about populations there. In present study, we investigate possibility applying spatial design used by Swedish Bird Survey for nationwide, gridbased sampling, goal get covering representative sample different We surveyed four 2×2 km squares, split into 100 m segments, southernmost region Sweden (Scania) northernmost (Norrbotten). grid-based transects were compared volunteer-selected G IS analysis using refined version CORINE land cover see how well these two transect designs represent true coverage. A total 53 was monitored, resulting 490 individuals 29 species recorded. found that correlated significantly overall both methods, though standardised outperformed representation Scania, not Norrbotten. Butterflies aggregate specific habitats, contrasting results geographically regions. Grasslands regions generated high number recorded butterflies, although so did clear-cut residential Norrbotten as well. highest per bogs Scania. study emphasises value complementing free site selection spatially such Survey, sheds some light on general preferences butterflies climatic Copyright Elin Videvall et al. is an open access article distributed under terms Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction any medium, provided original author source credited. (Less)

参考文章(33)
J.W. Dover, T.H. Sparks, J.N. Greatorex-Davies, The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 1, pp. 89- 97 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1018487127174
Roger LH Dennis, Tim H Sparks, Peter B Hardy, Bias in Butterfly Distribution Maps: The Effects of Sampling Effort Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 3, pp. 33- 42 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1009678422145
T.R. New, Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group‘ for biodiversity conservation? Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 1, pp. 5- 12 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1018433406701
RLH Dennis, CD Thomas, None, Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the influence of hot spots and recorder's home range. Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 4, pp. 73- 77 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1009690919835
D. B. ROY, P. ROTHERY, T. BRERETON, Reduced‐effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 44, pp. 993- 1000 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2007.01340.X
J. W. Dover, S. Spencer, S. Collins, I. Hadjigeorgiou, A. Rescia, Grassland butterflies and low intensity farming in Europe Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 15, pp. 129- 137 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10841-010-9332-0
Catherine M Davey, Vincent Devictor, Niclas Jonzén, Åke Lindström, Henrik G Smith, None, Impact of climate change on communities: revealing species' contribution. Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 82, pp. 551- 561 ,(2013) , 10.1111/1365-2656.12035
Chris van Swaay, Martin Warren, Grégoire Loïs, Biotope use and trends of European butterflies Journal of Insect Conservation. ,vol. 10, pp. 189- 209 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S10841-006-6293-4
Dennis Jonason, Per Milberg, Karl-Olof Bergman, Monitoring of butterflies within a landscape context in south-eastern Sweden Journal for Nature Conservation. ,vol. 18, pp. 22- 33 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JNC.2009.02.001