作者: Marteau Tm , Vandrevala T , Drury J , Stott C , John A
DOI: 10.21203/RS.3.RS-401951/V1
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Background Covid-status certification – certificates for those who test negative the SARS-CoV-2 virus, positive antibodies, or have been vaccinated against has proposed to enable safer access a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part upon behavioural and social impacts certification. The aim this rapid review was describe public attitudes towards certification, its possible impact on uptake testing vaccination, protective behaviours, crime. Method A search undertaken peer-reviewed databases, pre-print grey literature, from 2000 December 2020. Studies were included if they measured consequences health based one three indices Covid-19 status: test-negative result current infectiousness, test-positive antibodies conferring natural immunity, vaccination(s) immunity. Results Thirty-three papers met inclusion criteria, only which rated as low risk bias. Public generally favourable use immunity international travel, but unfavourable their work other significant minority strongly opposed any purpose. limited evidence suggested that intention get varied with activity enabled by vaccination (e.g., travel). Where is seen compulsory could lead unwillingness accept subsequent vaccination. There some restricting settings activities antibody may deliberate exposure infection minority. Behaviours reduce transmission decrease status, including physical distancing handwashing. Conclusions suggests relation COVID-19 outside context travel potential harm well benefit. while minimising harms require real-time evaluations allowing modifications maximise contribution