Empathy and Expertise: Case Workers and Immigration/Asylum Applicants in London

作者: Deborah James , Evan Killick

DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.2012.01312.X

关键词:

摘要: Under recent reforms, the UK government has eroded state funding for civil legal aid. Funding cuts affect asylum and immigration law as produced, practiced, and mediated in the course of interactions between case workers and their clients in legal-aid-funded Law Centers in South London. The article explores the contradictory character of one-on-one relationships between case workers and clients. Despite pressure to quantify their work in “value for money” terms, the empathy that often motivates case workers drives them to provide exceptional levels of aid to their clients in facing an arbitrary bureaucracy. Such personalized commitment may persuade applicants to accept the decisions of that bureaucracy, thus reinforcing a hegemonic understanding of the power of the law. The article, however, challenges the assumption that, in attempting to shape immigrant/refugees as model—albeit second-class—citizens, case worker/client interactions necessarily subscribe to the categories and assumptions that underpin UK immigration and asylum law.

参考文章(25)
M. Villarreal, N.E. Long, The interweaving of knowledge and power in development interfaces. Beyond farmer first: rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. pp. 41- 52 ,(1994)
Alice Bloch, Liza Schuster, Asylum and welfare: contemporary debates Critical Social Policy. ,vol. 22, pp. 393- 414 ,(2002) , 10.1177/026101830202200302
Austin Sarat, Jennifer L. Pierce, Stuart Scheingold, Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities ,(1998)
David Coleman, Robert Rowthorn, The Economic Effects of Immigration into the United Kingdom Population and Development Review. ,vol. 30, pp. 579- 624 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1728-4457.2004.00034.X