The compatibility of property dualism and substance materialism

作者: Eric Yang

DOI: 10.1007/S11098-015-0465-6

关键词:

摘要: Several philosophers have argued that property dualism and substance materialism are incompatible positions. Recently, Susan Schneider has provided a novel version of such an argument, claiming the incompatibility will be evident once we examine some underlying metaphysical issues. She purports to show on any account property-possession, turn out incompatible. In this paper, I argue Schneider’s case for between these two positions fails. After briefly laying her incompatibility, present substance—one relies relational ontology—that makes combination unproblematic. Then even under theories considers—those rely constituent ontology—there still is no problem.

参考文章(23)
E.T. Olson, An Argument for Animalism Blackwell. ,(2003)
PF Snowdon, Persons, animals and ourselves (1st ed.). OUP: Oxford. (2013) (In press).. ,(2013)
Karen Bennett, Dean W. Zimmerman, Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. ,(2011) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199603039.001.0001
Andrea Lavazza, Howard Robinson, Contemporary dualism : a defense Routledge. ,(2014) , 10.4324/9780203579206
Peter van Inwagen, RELATIONAL vs. CONSTITUENT ONTOLOGIES Philosophical Perspectives. ,vol. 25, pp. 389- 405 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1520-8583.2011.00221.X
Susan Schneider, Non‐Reductive Physicalism and the Mind Problem 1 Noûs. ,vol. 47, pp. 135- 153 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1468-0068.2011.00847.X
William G. Lycan, Is property dualism better off than substance dualism? Philosophical Studies. ,vol. 164, pp. 533- 542 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11098-012-9867-X