A Clinical and Histopathologic Perspective on Evolving Noninvasive and Invasive Alternatives for Liver Biopsy

作者: Dirk J. Van Leeuwen , Charles Balabaud , James M. Crawford , Paulette Bioulac–Sage , Amar P. Dhillon

DOI: 10.1016/J.CGH.2008.02.023

关键词:

摘要: Noninvasive or minimally invasive alternatives are proposed as substitutes for liver biopsy and include clinical indices, cross-sectional imaging, serum biomarkers, stiffness measurement, portal pressure measurement. Most to assess one aspect of disease translate this into a numeric score. Overlap between categories may limit applications. Liver provides information about numerous variables: tissue architectural changes; necroinflammatory injury; fibrotic stage; alterations parenchyma bile duct epithelium; accumulation fat, copper, iron; molecular genetic changes. identify multiple etiologies. A single score cannot be substitute complete histologic assessment. However, within defined contexts, noninvasive assessment is an attractive alternative many patients given the ease, avoidance risk from procedures, validated contribution management. Serum biomarkers become indispensable in longitudinal studies document outcome treatments. The accuracy more reliable techniques typically around 80%. Neither nor any option represents absolute disease. Biopsy not mutually exclusive options. require clear understanding significance limitations each investigation. This places responsibility on clinician consider fully results investigative options used diagnostic prognostic context individual patient, choose critically most appropriate investigations patient's needs.

参考文章(67)
Edoardo Giannini, Federica Botta, Alberto Fasoli, Paola Ceppa, Domenico Risso, Pasquale Bruno Lantieri, Guido Celle, Roberto Testa, Progressive liver functional impairment is associated with an increase in AST/ALT ratio. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. ,vol. 44, pp. 1249- 1253 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1026609231094
Liver biopsy sampling in chronic viral hepatitis. Seminars in Liver Disease. ,vol. 24, pp. 89- 97 ,(2004) , 10.1055/S-2004-823103
Giada Sebastiani, Alfredo Alberti, Non invasive fibrosis biomarkers reduce but not substitute the need for liver biopsy World Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 12, pp. 3682- 3694 ,(2006) , 10.3748/WJG.V12.I23.3682
Helena Nyblom, Einar Bjornsson, Magnus Simren, Frank Aldenborg, Sven Almer, Rolf Olsson, The AST/ALT ratio as an indicator of cirrhosis in patients with PBC Liver International. ,vol. 26, pp. 840- 845 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1478-3231.2006.01304.X
Jose A. Carrión, Miquel Navasa, Jaume Bosch, Miquel Bruguera, Rosa Gilabert, Xavier Forns, Transient elastography for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation Liver Transplantation. ,vol. 12, pp. 1791- 1798 ,(2006) , 10.1002/LT.20857
C. A Siegel, A. M Silas, A. A Suriawinata, D. J van Leeuwen, Liver biopsy 2005: when and how? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 199- 224 ,(2005) , 10.3949/CCJM.72.3.199
Paul J Thuluvath, Karen L Krok, Noninvasive markers of fibrosis for longitudinal assessment of fibrosis in chronic liver disease : Are they ready for prime time? The American Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 101, pp. 1497- 1499 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1572-0241.2005.00304.X
R.J.G. Chalmers, B. Kirby, A. Smith, P. Burrows, R. Little, M. Horan, J.M. Hextall, C.H. Smith, M. Klaber, S. Rogers, Replacement of routine liver biopsy by procollagen III aminopeptide for monitoring patients with psoriasis receiving long‐term methotrexate: a multicentre audit and health economic analysis British Journal of Dermatology. ,vol. 152, pp. 444- 450 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1365-2133.2005.06422.X
Valeer J Desmet, Tania Roskams, Cirrhosis reversal: a duel between dogma and myth Journal of Hepatology. ,vol. 40, pp. 860- 867 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JHEP.2004.03.007
T SCHIANO, S AZEEM, C BODIAN, H BODENHEIMERJR, S MERATI, S THUNG, P HYTIROGLOU, Importance of Specimen Size in Accurate Needle Liver Biopsy Evaluation of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. ,vol. 3, pp. 930- 935 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1542-3565(05)00541-0