Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science

作者: RICHARD A. FULLER , JASMINE R. LEE , JAMES E. M. WATSON

DOI: 10.1111/COBI.12346

关键词:

摘要: Conservation science is a crisis discipline in which the results of scientific enquiry must be made available quickly to those implementing management. We assessed extent research published since year 2000 20 conservation journals publicly available. Of 19,207 papers published, 1,667 (8.68%) are freely downloadable from an official repository. Moreover, only 938 (4.88%) meet standard definition open access material can reused providing attribution authors given. This compares poorly with comparable set evolutionary biology journals, where 31.93% and 7.49% access. Seventeen offer option, but fewer than 5% through The cost accessing full body runs into tens thousands dollars per for institutional subscribers, many practitioners cannot pay-per-view their workplace. However, important initiatives such as Research4Life making organizations developing countries. urge pay on per-article basis or choose publication taking care ensure license allows reuse any purpose Currently, it would $51 million make all by paying fees currently levied authors. Publishers might consider more effective models conservation-oriented running could broader range options nonmembers sponsorship via membership fees.

参考文章(32)
Jessica C. Walsh, Lynn V. Dicks, William J. Sutherland, The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 88- 98 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12370
Virginia Matzek, Justin Covino, Jennifer L. Funk, Martin Saunders, Closing the Knowing–Doing Gap in Invasive Plant Management: Accessibility and Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Research Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 208- 215 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12042
P. M Davis, B. V Lewenstein, D. H Simon, J. G Booth, M. J L Connolly, Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. ,vol. 337, pp. 343- 345 ,(2008) , 10.1136/BMJ.A568
Carly N. Cook, R.W. (Bill) Carter, Richard A. Fuller, Marc Hockings, Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 113, pp. 341- 346 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2012.09.002
Stevan Harnad, Chawki Hajjem, Eberhard R. Hilf, Yves Gingras, Tim Brody, François Vallières, Steve Hitchcock, Charles Oppenheim, Les Carr, The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update Serials Review. ,vol. 34, pp. 36- 40 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.SERREV.2007.12.005
Raphaël Arlettaz, Michael Schaub, Jérôme Fournier, Thomas S. Reichlin, Antoine Sierro, James E. M. Watson, Veronika Braunisch, From Publications to Public Actions: When Conservation Biologists Bridge the Gap between Research and Implementation BioScience. ,vol. 60, pp. 835- 842 ,(2010) , 10.1525/BIO.2010.60.10.10
Mikael Laakso, Patrik Welling, Helena Bukvova, Linus Nyman, Bo-Christer Björk, Turid Hedlund, The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLOS ONE. ,vol. 6, ,(2011) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0020961