Correlation between subjective and objective measures of outcome in staffed community housing.
作者： J. Perry , D. Felce
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2788.2005.00652.X
关键词:
摘要: Background: A distinction is made between objective and subjective assessment when quality of life evaluation considered. The aim was to explore the association appraisals within similar domains. Methods: Correlations scores on measures concerning choice, activity integration were investigated by administering residents a random sample 47 small community housing services. resident adaptive behaviour also investigated. Results: All significantly correlated with but only one measure was. With level controlled, 6/7 correlations pairs significant. Fifteen 16 insignificant. Conclusions: Assessments conditions personal satisfaction appear be distinct. Their suitability for different purposes notion that appraisal may under homeostatic regulation are discussed.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(28)
Eric B. Emerson, Evaluating the impact of deinstitutionalization on the lives of mentally retarded people. American journal of mental deficiency. ,vol. 90, pp. 277- 288 ,(1985)
Edgerton Rb, Herr B, Bollinger M, The cloak of competence: after two decades. American journal of mental deficiency. ,vol. 88, pp. 345- ,(1984)
David Felce, Kathy Lowe, Edwin Jones, Association between the Provision Characteristics and Operation of Supported Housing Services and Resident Outcomes Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. ,vol. 15, pp. 404- 418 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1468-3148.2002.00131.X
D. Felce, K. Lowe, J. Perry, H. Baxter, E. Jonesna, A. Hallam, J. Beecham, Service support to people in Wales with severe intellectual disability and the most severe challenging behaviours: processes, outcomes and costs Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. ,vol. 42, pp. 390- 408 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1365-2788.1998.00153.X
Robert A. Cummins, On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being Social Indicators Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 537- 558 ,(1995) , 10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_18
Robert A Cummins, The Validity and Utility of Subjective Quality of Life: a Reply to Hatton & Ager Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. ,vol. 15, pp. 261- 268 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1468-3148.2002.00123.X
Roger J. Stancliffe, K. Charlie Lakin, Analysis of Expenditures and Outcomes of Residential Alternatives for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation. ,vol. 102, pp. 552- 568 ,(1997) , 10.1352/0895-8017(1998)102<0552:AOEAOO>2.0.CO;2
Paul T. Costa, Robert R. McCrae, Alan B. Zonderman, Environmental and dispositional influences on well‐being: Longitudinal follow‐up of an American national sample British Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 78, pp. 299- 306 ,(1987) , 10.1111/J.2044-8295.1987.TB02248.X
Jonathan Perry, David Felce, Objective assessments of quality of life: How much do they agree with each other? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 19 ,(1995) , 10.1002/CASP.2450050102
Chris Hatton, Whose quality of life is it anyway? Some problems with the emerging quality of life consensus Mental Retardation. ,vol. 36, pp. 104- 115 ,(1998) , 10.1352/0047-6765(1998)036<0104:WQOLII>2.0.CO;2