Relationship between Self‐Report and Proxy Ratings on Assessed Personal Quality of Life‐Related Outcomes

作者: Claudia Claes , Stijn Vandevelde , Geert Van Hove , Jos van Loon , Griet Verschelden

DOI: 10.1111/J.1741-1130.2012.00353.X

关键词: Intellectual disabilityMultiple disabilitiesClinical psychologyScale (social sciences)Consistency (negotiation)RespondentReliability (statistics)PsychologyProxy ratingsQuality of life (healthcare)

摘要: Quality of life scores obtained from self-reports might not be the same as those a family member or direct support staff. The purpose two studies reported in this article was to evaluate further impact on quality self-report vs. proxy ratings. Personal Outcomes Scale administered persons with an intellectual disability. version, well observation administered. In use form, staff and members acted respondents. Study 1, which evaluated consistency between data using respondents, found significant mean differences respondent groups three domains acceptable level internal for both strategies. 2, difference (by client) ratings (of individual) interviews some client but no Correlations group fell within “good category.” authors noted need methodological pluralism assessment, importance by disability, develop better more reliably user-friendly strategies outcomes individuals who either do cannot respond themselves.

参考文章(41)
Robert A. Cummins, The Second Approximation to an International Standard for Life Satisfaction Social Indicators Research. ,vol. 43, pp. 307- 334 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1006831107052
Katherine D. Tsatsanis, Nancy Dartnall, Domenic Cicchetti, Sara S. Sparrow, Ami Klin, Fred R. Volkmar, Concurrent validity and classification accuracy of the Leiter and Leiter-R in low-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. ,vol. 33, pp. 23- 30 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1022274219808
Robert A. Cummins, Caregivers as Managers of Subjective Wellbeing: A Homeostatic Perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. ,vol. 18, pp. 335- 344 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1468-3148.2005.00267.X
C. Claes, G. Van Hove, J. van Loon, S. Vandevelde, R. L. Schalock, Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. ,vol. 53, pp. 329- 338 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2788.2008.01149.X
Jennifer M. Gottschalk, Myrna E. Libby, Richard B. Graff, The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. ,vol. 33, pp. 85- 88 ,(2000) , 10.1901/JABA.2000.33-85
Sönke Arlt, Juliane Hornung, M. Eichenlaub, Holger Jahn, Monika Bullinger, Corinna Petersen, The patient with dementia, the caregiver and the doctor: cognition, depression and quality of life from three perspectives. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. ,vol. 23, pp. 604- 610 ,(2008) , 10.1002/GPS.1946
M. Rapley, J. Ridgway, S. Beyer, Staff:staff and staff:client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. ,vol. 42, pp. 37- 42 ,(1998) , 10.1046/J.1365-2788.1998.00066.X
J. Perry, D. Felce, Correlation between subjective and objective measures of outcome in staffed community housing. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. ,vol. 49, pp. 278- 287 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1365-2788.2005.00652.X
Claudia Claes, Geert Van Hove, Jos van Loon, Stijn Vandevelde, Robert L. Schalock, Quality of Life Measurement in the Field of Intellectual Disabilities: Eight Principles for Assessing Quality of Life-Related Personal Outcomes Social Indicators Research. ,vol. 98, pp. 61- 72 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11205-009-9517-7
Roger J Stancliffe, Proxy respondents and quality of life Evaluation and Program Planning. ,vol. 23, pp. 89- 93 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0149-7189(99)00042-7